Deng Hong-Wen, Xu Fu-Hua, Davies K Michael, Heaney Robert, Recker Robert R
Osteoporosis Research Center, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
J Bone Miner Metab. 2002;20(6):358-66. doi: 10.1007/s007740200052.
Osteoporotic fractures are a major public health problem, particularly in women. Bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and bone size have been regarded as important determinants of osteoporotic fractures. In 1449 women over age 30 years, we studied the detailed relationship, at the spine and hip, between BMD, BMC, and bone areal size (all measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and compared their relative magnitudes in fracturing and non-fracturing individuals. We find that, (1) BMD and BMC are significantly higher at the spine and hip in non-fracturing women. Bone areal size is significantly larger at the spine in non-fracturing women; however, the significance disappears when adjustment is made for the significant difference of height (stature) between fracturing and non-fracturing women. In contrast to the spine, bone areal size is always significantly largerin fracturing women at the hip. (2) The relationship among BMD, BMC, and bone areal size is different at the spine and hip. Specifically, at the spine, BMD increases with bone areal size linearly. At the hip, BMD has a quadratic relationship with bone areal size, so that BMD increases at lower bone areal sizes, then (after an intermediate zone of values) decreases with increasing bone areal size. However, BMD adjusted for BMC always decreases with increasing bone areal size, as expected by the definition of BMD. With no adjustment for BMC, the increase in BMD with bone areal size is due to a more rapid increase of BMC than increasing bone areal size, thus explaining the observations of association of both larger BMD and larger bone areal size with stronger bone. (3) At the spine, 86.2% of BMD variation is attributable to BMC and 12.6% to bone areal size. At the hip, 98.0% of BMD variation is due to BMC and 1.1% due to bone areal size. The current study may be important in understanding the relationship among BMD, BMC, and bone size as risk determinants of osteoporotic fractures.
骨质疏松性骨折是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在女性中尤为突出。骨密度(BMD)、骨矿物质含量(BMC)和骨大小被视为骨质疏松性骨折的重要决定因素。在1449名30岁以上的女性中,我们研究了脊柱和髋部BMD、BMC与骨面积大小(均通过双能X线吸收法测量)之间的详细关系,并比较了骨折和未骨折个体中它们的相对大小。我们发现,(1)未骨折女性的脊柱和髋部BMD和BMC显著更高。未骨折女性的脊柱骨面积大小显著更大;然而,在对骨折和未骨折女性之间的身高( stature)显著差异进行调整后,这种显著性消失。与脊柱相反,骨折女性髋部的骨面积大小总是显著更大。(2)BMD、BMC和骨面积大小之间的关系在脊柱和髋部有所不同。具体而言,在脊柱,BMD随骨面积大小呈线性增加。在髋部,BMD与骨面积大小呈二次关系,因此在较低的骨面积大小时BMD增加,然后(在一个中间值区域之后)随骨面积大小增加而降低。然而,根据BMD的定义,经BMC调整后的BMD总是随骨面积大小增加而降低。在未对BMC进行调整时,BMD随骨面积大小增加是由于BMC的增加比骨面积大小的增加更快,从而解释了BMD较大和骨面积大小较大与更强壮骨骼相关的观察结果。(3)在脊柱,86.2%的BMD变异归因于BMC,12.6%归因于骨面积大小。在髋部,98.0%的BMD变异归因于BMC,1.1%归因于骨面积大小。本研究对于理解BMD、BMC和骨大小作为骨质疏松性骨折风险决定因素之间的关系可能具有重要意义。