Zrostlíková Jitka, Hajslová Jana, Poustka Jan, Begany Pavel
Institute of Chemical Technology, Technická 3, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Chromatogr A. 2002 Oct 11;973(1-2):13-26. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01196-2.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of different calibration approaches in a multi- and single-residue analysis of modern pesticides in plant matrices using liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS). In the first set of experiments the determination of eight pesticides representing different groups of polar/unstable pesticides (carbamates, benzimidazoles, azoles, benzoylphenylurea) in apple samples was performed. The trueness and precision of data obtained by using: (i) external solvent standard calibration, (ii) external matrix-matched standard calibration and (iii) echo-peak internal standard calibration was compared. The last mentioned method is a novel technique providing the possibility to inject internal standard of the same identity as a target analyte, so that its retention time is close to the analyte from the sample. According to expectation, when using external standard solvent calibration the results were under- or overestimated due to suppression or enhancement of analyte's signal by matrix components. On the other hand with the use of matrix-matched calibration accurate data were obtained. With echo-peak technique accurate results comparable to those obtained by matrix calibration were obtained for six out of eight pesticides. In the second set of experiment we used the echo-peak technique to overcome the problem with the response instability in the analysis of chlormequat in pear concentrate samples. As an internal standard method the echo-peak technique provided the possibility of monitoring of signal decrease during the analytical sequence and to compensate this decrease by relating sample peak area relatively to this internal standard.
本研究的目的是评估不同校准方法在使用液相色谱 - 电喷雾质谱法(HPLC - ESI - MS)对植物基质中的现代农药进行多残留和单残留分析时的适用性。在第一组实验中,对苹果样品中代表不同极性/不稳定农药组(氨基甲酸酯类、苯并咪唑类、唑类、苯甲酰基苯基脲类)的八种农药进行了测定。比较了使用以下方法获得的数据的准确性和精密度:(i)外部溶剂标准校准,(ii)外部基质匹配标准校准,以及(iii)回波峰内标校准。最后提到的方法是一种新技术,它提供了注入与目标分析物具有相同特性的内标的可能性,从而使其保留时间接近样品中的分析物。正如预期的那样,使用外部标准溶剂校准时,由于基质成分对分析物信号的抑制或增强,结果被低估或高估。另一方面,使用基质匹配校准获得了准确的数据。使用回波峰技术,八种农药中有六种获得了与基质校准相当的准确结果。在第二组实验中,我们使用回波峰技术来克服梨浓缩液样品中矮壮素分析时响应不稳定的问题。作为一种内标方法,回波峰技术提供了在分析过程中监测信号下降的可能性,并通过将样品峰面积与该内标相对比来补偿这种下降。