Wong A C-M, Wong C-C, Yuen N S-Y, Hui S-P
Lo Ka Chow Memorial Ophthalmic Centre, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, PRC.
Eye (Lond). 2002 Nov;16(6):715-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700211.
Central corneal thickness (CCT) of 74 eyes from 39 normal Hong Kong Chinese subjects with ages ranging from 39 to 86 years were studied.
AIM & PURPOSE: To compare the measurements of different devices and to compare the results of ethnic groups in other studies.
Non-contact measurements by Orbscan and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) were first carried out, followed by contact measurement using Ultrasound Pachymetry. The results of five measurements of Ultrasound Pachymetry and three measurements of OCT and Orbscan were each averaged and compared using correlation, linear regression and one-way analysis of variance methods.
The measurements of three devices were significantly correlated (P < 0.01). The mean CCT in our study group measured by Orbscan (with an acoustic factor set at 0.92), Ultrasound Pachymetry and OCT were 555.96 +/- 32.41, 555.11 +/- 35.30 and 523.2 +/- 33.54 microm respectively. A linear regression model (using ultrasound measurements as standard) was presented.
When a correction factor of 32 microm was applied to OCT measurements, the means of three devices became significantly equal. The adjusted OCT measurements were less precise within subjects but more accurate than Orbscan when compared with ultrasound pachymetry as a reference standard. The mean CCT measurement of our sample was comparable to some studies on Hong Kong Chinese, Caucasians and Japanese but higher than those on some Europeans, Asian and North Americans of African origin.
对39名年龄在39至86岁之间的正常香港华人受试者的74只眼睛的中央角膜厚度(CCT)进行了研究。
比较不同设备的测量结果,并与其他研究中不同种族的结果进行比较。
首先使用Orbscan和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)进行非接触式测量,然后使用超声测厚法进行接触式测量。对超声测厚法的五次测量结果以及OCT和Orbscan的三次测量结果分别进行平均,并使用相关性、线性回归和单因素方差分析方法进行比较。
三种设备的测量结果具有显著相关性(P < 0.01)。在我们的研究组中,通过Orbscan(声学因子设置为0.92)、超声测厚法和OCT测量的平均CCT分别为555.96 +/- 32.41、555.11 +/- 35.30和523.2 +/- 33.54微米。提出了一个线性回归模型(以超声测量为标准)。
当对OCT测量应用32微米的校正因子时,三种设备的平均值变得显著相等。与超声测厚法作为参考标准相比,调整后的OCT测量在受试者内部的精度较低,但比Orbscan更准确。我们样本的平均CCT测量结果与一些关于香港华人、白种人和日本人的研究结果相当,但高于一些欧洲人、亚洲人和非洲裔北美人的研究结果。