Hobbs F D R, Kenkre J E, Roalfe A K, Davis R C, Hare R, Davies M K
Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Primary Care Clinical Sciences Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.
Eur Heart J. 2002 Dec;23(23):1867-76. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3255.
Heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are increasingly common disorders, with outcomes worse than many cancers. Evidence-based therapies, such as ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, improve prognosis and symptoms, and reduce healthcare expenditure. However, despite the high prevalence and malignant prognosis, few studies have reported the impact of heart failure and LVSD on overall quality of life and, more crucially, have not researched the elderly or those in the community.
All patients attending the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening (ECHOES) study of the prevalence of heart failure and LVSD in the community were assessed by clinical history and examination, electrocardiogram and echocardiography, and also completed the SF36 health status questionnaire. Quality of life in patients found to have heart failure, LVSD, and other cardiac and medical conditions are compared with the randomly selected general population sample. Data are generalisable to the UK.
6162 people in the community were screened in the ECHOES study, of whom 5961 (97%) completed the SF36. The health perceptions of 3850 people aged 45 years or older selected randomly from the population were compared with those of 426 patients diagnosed as having definite heart failure. Those with heart failure had significant impairment of all the measured aspects of physical and mental health, in addition to declines in physical functioning. Significantly worse impairment was found in those with more severe heart failure by NYHA class: indeed, NYHA functional class was closely correlated to SF36 score. Patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and patients rendered asymptomatic by treatment had similar scores to the random population sample. Those with heart failure reported more severe physical impairment of quality of life than people giving a history of chronic lung disease or arthritis, with less impact on mental health than patients reporting depression.
Patients with heart failure have statistically significant impairment of all aspects of quality of life, not simply physical functioning. The physical (role and functioning) health burden was significantly greater than that suffered in other serious common chronic disorders, whether cardiac or other systems. Optimising treatment to improve NYHA class appears to improve perceptions of quality of life for patients with heart failure. Given the dramatic decline in quality of life with heart failure, this end-point should be a much more important target for healthcare interventions, especially treatments such as ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers that are shown to improve quality of life.
心力衰竭和左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)是日益常见的疾病,其预后比许多癌症更差。基于证据的疗法,如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂,可改善预后和症状,并降低医疗保健支出。然而,尽管患病率高且预后不良,但很少有研究报告心力衰竭和LVSD对总体生活质量的影响,更关键的是,尚未对老年人或社区中的人群进行研究。
通过临床病史和检查、心电图和超声心动图对参加英格兰心脏超声心动图筛查(ECHOES)研究的社区心力衰竭和LVSD患病率的所有患者进行评估,并完成SF36健康状况问卷。将被发现患有心力衰竭、LVSD以及其他心脏和医疗疾病的患者的生活质量与随机选择的普通人群样本进行比较。数据适用于英国。
ECHOES研究对社区中的6162人进行了筛查,其中5961人(97%)完成了SF36。将从人群中随机选择的3850名45岁及以上人群的健康认知与426名被诊断为明确心力衰竭的患者的健康认知进行比较。心力衰竭患者在所有测量的身心健康方面均有显著损害,此外身体功能也有所下降。根据纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级发现,心力衰竭更严重的患者损害明显更严重:事实上,NYHA功能分级与SF36评分密切相关。无症状左心室功能障碍患者和经治疗后无症状的患者的评分与随机人群样本相似。心力衰竭患者报告的生活质量身体损害比有慢性肺病或关节炎病史的人更严重,对心理健康的影响比报告有抑郁症的患者小。
心力衰竭患者在生活质量的所有方面均有统计学上的显著损害,而不仅仅是身体功能。身体(角色和功能)健康负担明显大于其他严重常见慢性疾病(无论是心脏疾病还是其他系统疾病)所带来的负担。优化治疗以改善NYHA分级似乎可以改善心力衰竭患者对生活质量的认知。鉴于心力衰竭会导致生活质量急剧下降,这一终点应该成为医疗干预的一个更为重要的目标,尤其是血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂等已被证明可改善生活质量的治疗方法。