Dekker Marielle C, Koot Hans M, van der Ende Jan, Verhulst Frank C
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;43(8):1087-98. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00235.
The main objective of this study was to assess and compare the prevalence of a wide range of emotional and behavioral problems in children with and without intellectual disability (ID).
We studied 1,041 non-residential children randomly selected from special schools for educable (IQ 60 to 80) and trainable (IQ 30 to 60) children without severe additional physical or sensory impairments, and compared them to 1,855 children randomly selected from the general population (both ages 6 to 18). Parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and teachers the Teacher's Report Form (TRF).
Controlling for sex, age, and socioeconomic status, we found that both educable and trainable children had significantly higher mean scores on all CBCL and TRF scales than children without ID, except for trainable children on the scales Anxious/Depressed and Somatic Complaints. Almost 50% of children with ID had a Total Problem score in the deviant range compared to about 18% in children without ID. Compared to children without ID, the most prominent problem behaviors of educable children were Social Problems, Attention Problems, and Aggressive Behavior, and trainable children had an increased risk for Social Problems, Attention Problems, Withdrawn and Thought Problems.
Elevated scale scores reflected differences between children with and without ID over a broad range of items, and not solely on items more likely to be related to developmental delay. Therefore, problem areas covered by the items in these scales deserve special attention in the mental health care of children with ID.
本研究的主要目的是评估和比较有智力障碍(ID)和无智力障碍儿童中广泛的情绪和行为问题的患病率。
我们研究了从可教育(智商60至80)和可训练(智商30至60)儿童的特殊学校中随机选取的1041名非寄宿儿童,这些儿童没有严重的额外身体或感官障碍,并将他们与从普通人群(年龄均为6至18岁)中随机选取的1855名儿童进行比较。家长填写了儿童行为清单(CBCL),教师填写了教师报告表(TRF)。
在控制了性别、年龄和社会经济地位后,我们发现,除了可训练儿童在焦虑/抑郁和躯体主诉量表上的得分外,可教育和可训练儿童在所有CBCL和TRF量表上的平均得分均显著高于无智力障碍儿童。近50%的智力障碍儿童总问题得分处于异常范围,而无智力障碍儿童中这一比例约为18%。与无智力障碍儿童相比,可教育儿童最突出的问题行为是社交问题、注意力问题和攻击行为,可训练儿童出现社交问题、注意力问题、退缩和思维问题的风险增加。
量表得分升高反映了有智力障碍和无智力障碍儿童在广泛项目上的差异,而不仅仅是在更可能与发育迟缓相关的项目上。因此,这些量表项目所涵盖的问题领域在智力障碍儿童的心理保健中值得特别关注。