• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为背痛患者开发以患者为中心的信息。

Developing patient-centred information for back pain sufferers.

作者信息

Glenton Claire

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Welfare, PO Box 8054 Dep, N-0031 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):319-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00196.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00196.x
PMID:12460221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5142728/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify information needs among a group of back pain sufferers as well as the barriers that may prevent them from accessing this information.

DESIGN

Data were collected through the use of open, in-depth interviews, through contributions to the Norwegian Back Pain Association's online discussion list, and through a search of the literature.

PARTICIPANTS

Norwegian back pain sufferers and their carers.

MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED

Information needs and barriers.

RESULTS

The informants described information needs that covered a wide range of topics, clinical, financial, emotional and social. Informants wanted to understand the cause of their pain and wanted information about existing diagnoses and diagnostic procedures. Informants asked for information about treatment alternatives, both within and outside the established health-care system, the effects of these treatment alternatives, their procedures, side-effects and costs. In addition, informants wanted information about the social and emotional effects of long-term pain; coping with everyday life; other people's experiences; and about welfare benefits and patient rights. Barriers to this information included the use of medical, legal and other jargon, doctors' lack of time, lack of communication skills, lack of knowledge about back pain and attitudes to back pain patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To successfully address the questions and concerns of users, there should be an attempt to present information on as many of these topics as possible. Information should be presented in the user's own language, at several levels of understanding, and should include both evidence- and experienced-based knowledge.

摘要

目的

确定一组背痛患者的信息需求以及可能阻碍他们获取这些信息的障碍。

设计

通过开放式深入访谈、对挪威背痛协会在线讨论列表的贡献以及文献检索来收集数据。

参与者

挪威背痛患者及其护理人员。

研究的主要变量

信息需求和障碍。

结果

受访者描述的信息需求涵盖广泛主题,包括临床、财务、情感和社会方面。受访者希望了解疼痛的原因,并希望获得有关现有诊断和诊断程序的信息。受访者询问了既定医疗保健系统内外的治疗选择、这些治疗选择的效果、其程序、副作用和成本的信息。此外,受访者希望了解长期疼痛的社会和情感影响;应对日常生活;他人的经验;以及福利和患者权利的信息。获取这些信息的障碍包括医学、法律和其他专业术语的使用、医生时间不足、沟通技巧欠缺、对背痛缺乏了解以及对背痛患者的态度。

结论

为了成功解决用户的问题和担忧,应该尝试尽可能多地就这些主题提供信息。信息应以用户自己的语言呈现,具有多个理解层次,并且应包括基于证据和经验的知识。

相似文献

1
Developing patient-centred information for back pain sufferers.为背痛患者开发以患者为中心的信息。
Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):319-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00196.x.
2
Chronic back pain sufferers--striving for the sick role.慢性背痛患者——渴望扮演病人角色。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(11):2243-52. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00130-8.
3
Information needs of people with low back pain for an online resource: a qualitative study of consumer views.腰痛患者对在线资源的信息需求:消费者观点的定性研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(13):1085-91. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.829532. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
4
Lay perceptions of evidence-based information--a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers.基于证据的信息的外行认知——对一个背痛患者网站的定性评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Mar 15;6:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-34.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Narratives of life with long-term low back pain: A follow up interview study.长期腰痛患者的生活叙事:一项随访访谈研究。
Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
Barriers to patient information provision in primary care: patients' and general practitioners' experiences and expectations of information for low back pain.基层医疗中患者信息提供的障碍:患者及全科医生对于腰痛信息的体验与期望
Health Expect. 2003 Mar;6(1):19-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00197.x.
8
Effectiveness of a Web-based tailored interactive health communication application for patients with type 2 diabetes or chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial.基于网络的定制交互式健康交流应用程序对2型糖尿病患者或慢性下背痛患者的有效性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 3;17(3):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3904.
9
[Psychological mechanisms in the transition from acute to chronic pain: over- or underrated?].[从急性疼痛转变为慢性疼痛的心理机制:被高估还是被低估?]
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):442-7. doi: 10.1007/s004820100030.
10
Living with motor neurone disease: lives, experiences of services and suggestions for change.与运动神经元病共存:生活、服务体验及变革建议
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Jan;13(1):64-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00530.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Information Leaflets for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Missed Opportunity.腰椎手术患者信息手册:一个被错失的机会。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1403-1409. doi: 10.1177/2374373519897176. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
2
Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study.开发一份用于交流医疗干预效果的循证信息的清单:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 21;10(7):e036348. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348.
3
An Internet-Based Consumer Resource for People with Low Back Pain (MyBackPain): Development and Evaluation.基于互联网的腰痛患者消费者资源(MyBackPain):开发与评估
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Mar 31;7(1):e16101. doi: 10.2196/16101.
4
MyBackPain-evaluation of an innovative consumer-focused website for low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.我的背痛——一个创新的以消费者为中心的腰痛网站评估:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 14;9(5):e027516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027516.
5
Who can you trust? A review of free online sources of "trustworthy" information about treatment effects for patients and the public.谁可以信任?对关于患者和公众的治疗效果的“可信”信息的免费在线资源进行了综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Feb 20;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0772-5.
6
Design and development of a decision support package for low back pain.设计和开发用于腰痛的决策支持包。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jun;66(6):925-33. doi: 10.1002/acr.22252.
7
Divided by a lack of common language? A qualitative study exploring the use of language by health professionals treating back pain.缺乏共同语言?一项探索治疗背痛的卫生专业人员使用语言情况的定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Oct 5;10:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-123.
8
Information in mental health: qualitative study of mental health service users.心理健康信息:对心理健康服务使用者的定性研究
Health Expect. 2006 Dec;9(4):359-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00403.x.
9
Lay perceptions of evidence-based information--a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers.基于证据的信息的外行认知——对一个背痛患者网站的定性评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Mar 15;6:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-34.
10
Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputation: a vignette study with patients and professionals.满足糖尿病相关截肢风险人群的教育需求:一项针对患者和专业人员的案例研究
Health Expect. 2005 Dec;8(4):324-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00344.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities.互联网社区定性研究中的伦理问题。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1103-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103.
2
Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets.纠正错误?对已发表的关于患者信息手册使用的论述的分析
Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1417-32. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00247-1.
3
The use of evidence by health care user organizations.
Health Expect. 1998 Jun;1(1):14-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00002.x.
4
Surfing for back pain patients: the nature and quality of back pain information on the Internet.为背痛患者搜索:互联网上背痛信息的性质与质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 1;26(5):545-57. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00020.
5
Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.医患关系中的家长主义、患者自主权与道德考量:挪威医生的态度
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan;52(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00224-0.
6
The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature.
J Clin Nurs. 1999 Nov;8(6):631-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00296.x.
7
Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study.全科医疗咨询中患者未明确表达的议程:定性研究
BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1246-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246.
8
[Being believed is what counts. A qualitative study of experiences with the health service among patients with chronic back pain].[被信任才是关键。对慢性背痛患者医疗服务体验的质性研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Apr 30;119(11):1630-2.
9
[The pain takes hold of life. A qualitative study of how patients with chronic back pain experience and cope with their life situation].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Apr 30;119(11):1624-9.
10
In the system: the lived experience of chronic back pain from the perspectives of those seeking help from pain clinics.在该系统中:从那些在疼痛诊所寻求帮助的人的角度看慢性背痛的生活体验。
Pain. 1999 Apr;80(3):621-628. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00254-1.