Laasonen M, Service E, Virsu V
Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 13, (Meritullinkatu 1), 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Dec;1(4):394-410. doi: 10.3758/cabn.1.4.394.
We studied the temporal acuity of 16 developmentally dyslexic young adults in three perceptual modalities. The control group consisted of 16 age- and IQ-matched normal readers. Two methods were used. In the temporal order judgment (TOJ) method, the stimuli were spatially separate fingertip indentations in the tactile system, tone bursts of different pitches in audition, and light flashes in vision. Participants indicated which one of two stimuli appeared first. To test temporal processing acuity (TPA), the same 8-msec nonspeech stimuli were presented as two parallel sequences of three stimulus pulses. Participants indicated, without order judgments, whether the pulses of the two sequences were simultaneous or nonsimultaneous. The dyslexic readers were somewhat inferior to the normal readers in all six temporal acuity tasks on average. Thus, our results agreed with the existence of a pansensory temporal processing deficit associated with dyslexia in a language with shallow orthography (Finnish) and in well-educated adults. The dyslexic and normal readers' temporal acuities overlapped so much, however, that acuity deficits alone would not allow dyslexia diagnoses. It was irrelevant whether or not the acuity task required order judgments. The groups did not differ in the nontemporal aspects of our experiments. Correlations between temporal acuity and reading-related tasks suggested that temporal acuity is associated with phonological awareness.
我们研究了16名发育性阅读障碍的年轻成年人在三种感知模式下的时间敏锐度。对照组由16名年龄和智商匹配的正常阅读者组成。使用了两种方法。在时间顺序判断(TOJ)方法中,触觉系统中的刺激是空间上分开的指尖压痕,听觉中的不同音高的音爆,以及视觉中的闪光。参与者指出两个刺激中哪一个先出现。为了测试时间处理敏锐度(TPA),相同的8毫秒非语音刺激以三个刺激脉冲的两个平行序列呈现。参与者在不进行顺序判断的情况下指出两个序列的脉冲是同时的还是不同时的。阅读障碍读者在所有六项时间敏锐度任务上平均略逊于正常读者。因此,我们的结果与在一种正字法较浅的语言(芬兰语)中以及受过良好教育的成年人中存在与阅读障碍相关的全感官时间处理缺陷这一观点一致。然而,阅读障碍读者和正常读者的时间敏锐度有很大重叠,以至于仅敏锐度缺陷不足以诊断阅读障碍。敏锐度任务是否需要顺序判断并不重要。两组在我们实验的非时间方面没有差异。时间敏锐度与阅读相关任务之间的相关性表明,时间敏锐度与语音意识有关。