Franciosi Claudio M, Romano Fabrizio, Porta Giancarlo, Caprotti Roberto, De Fina Sergio, Colombo Giovanni, Porta Andrea, Uggeri Franco
Clinica Chirurgica I, Ospedale San Gerardo, II Università degli Studi di Milano, Bicocca, Italy.
Chir Ital. 2002 Sep-Oct;54(5):667-72.
Hydatid disease is quite rare in European countries outside the endemic areas. It occurs most frequently in the liver and lungs. Surgery remains the main treatment modality for hydatid disease of the liver. There is still considerable debate as to whether the best approach is conservative surgery or radical surgery in which the cyst is totally removed including the pericyst by total pericystectomy or partial hepatectomy. We report the results of our 15-year experience with this type of surgery. A series of 35 consecutive patients operated on for hydatid disease of the liver from January 1985 to December 2000 was analysed (18 women and 17 men with a mean age of 47.7 years). The most common complaints were pain (59%), hepatomegaly and intra-abdominal masses (37%). The cysts were single in 23 patients and multiple in 12, and were found in the right lobe in 21 cases (59%), in the left lobe in 9 cases (26%), and in both lobes in 5 (15%). In one patient (2.8%), concomitant extrahepatic (splenic) disease was present. The diameter of the cysts ranged from 3.5 to 20 cm (mean value: 9.5 cm). Patients were subdivided according to the kind of surgery (radical versus conservative) and period of operation (group 1: 1985-1992; group 2: 1993-2000). With the increase in surgical skills and the advent of new techniques, radical surgery (12 cystoperistectomies, 3 left lobectomies and 3 segmentectomies) came to be performed more frequently than conservative surgery in the second period (18/20 in group 2 versus in 7/15 group 1) with low complication rates, a 3.7% mortality rate and similar operative time (175 min versus 145 min) and hospital stay (16.8 days versus 19.2 days) as compared to the conservative approach. The policy of applying radical surgery whenever feasible can be implemented with acceptable morbidity and near zero mortality. Radical surgery, however, needs to be applied judiciously, and there is still an important role for conservative surgery.
在非流行区的欧洲国家,包虫病相当罕见。它最常发生于肝脏和肺脏。手术仍然是肝包虫病的主要治疗方式。对于最佳治疗方法是采用保守手术还是根治性手术(即通过全囊肿切除术或部分肝切除术将囊肿连同包囊一并完全切除),目前仍存在相当大的争议。我们报告了我们在这类手术方面15年的经验结果。分析了1985年1月至2000年12月期间连续接受肝包虫病手术的35例患者(18名女性和17名男性,平均年龄47.7岁)。最常见的症状是疼痛(59%)、肝肿大和腹腔内肿块(37%)。23例患者的囊肿为单发,12例为多发;21例(59%)的囊肿位于右叶,9例(26%)位于左叶,5例(15%)位于两叶。1例患者(2.8%)伴有肝外(脾脏)病变。囊肿直径为3.5至20厘米(平均值:9.5厘米)。根据手术方式(根治性手术与保守性手术)和手术时间将患者分组(第1组:1985 - 1992年;第2组:1993 - 2000年)。随着手术技术的提高和新技术的出现,在第二阶段,根治性手术(12例囊肿周围切除术、3例左叶切除术和3例肝段切除术)的实施频率高于保守性手术(第2组为18/20,第1组为7/15),并发症发生率低,死亡率为3.7%,与保守性手术相比,手术时间(175分钟对145分钟)和住院时间(16.8天对19.2天)相近。只要可行,采用根治性手术的策略可以在可接受的发病率和接近零死亡率的情况下实施。然而,根治性手术需要谨慎应用,保守性手术仍然具有重要作用。