After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.
作者信息
Coulter Angela
机构信息
Picker Institute Europe, Oxford OX1 1RX, UK. e-mail
出版信息
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):186-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.186.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):186-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.186.
2
Patient centred care: essential but probably not sufficient.以患者为中心的护理：至关重要但可能并不充分。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):117-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.117.
3
Bristol: still posing questions.
RCM Midwives J. 2002 Jul;5(7):212-3.
4
A very public failure: lessons for quality improvement in healthcare organisations from the Bristol Royal Infirmary.一次广为人知的失败：布里斯托尔皇家医院为医疗保健机构质量改进提供的教训
Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10(4):250-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100250...
5
After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.继布里斯托尔事件之后：将患者置于中心位置。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):648-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.648.
6
Alan Maynard on whether investment in 'quality' saves money.
Health Serv J. 2009 Jun 18;Suppl:8.
7
Making sure the right patient gets the right care.确保合适的患者得到合适的护理。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):329. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.329.
8
Quality and more quality.质量，还是质量。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004;17(7):366-7. doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa.2004.06217gaa.001.
9
QHC to become QSHC... Delivering safe health care: safety is a patient's right and the obligation of all health professionals.QHC将变为QSHC……提供安全的医疗保健：安全是患者的权利，也是所有医疗专业人员的义务。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10(4):199-200. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100199...
10
What is clinical governance?什么是临床治理？
IHRIM. 1999 Mar;40(1):37.
引用本文的文献
1
Patient and Family Involvement: A Discussion of Co-Led Redesign of Healthcare Services.患者及家属参与：关于共同主导的医疗服务重新设计的讨论
J Particip Med. 2018 Feb 1;10(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jopm.8957.
2
A critical analysis of user satisfaction surveys in addiction services: opioid maintenance treatment as a representative case study.成瘾服务中用户满意度调查的批判性分析：以阿片类药物维持治疗为例的代表性案例研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jan 21;8:107-17. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S52060. eCollection 2014.
本文引用的文献
1
Empathy is important for enablement.同理心对于赋能而言至关重要。
BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):865.
2
Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared?对医疗保健的期望：是被推动、被管理还是被分担？
Health Expect. 1998 Jun;1(1):3-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00001.x.
3
Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.情境效应对健康结果的影响：一项系统综述。
Lancet. 2001 Mar 10;357(9258):757-62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6.
4
Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.临床疗效总结的患者选择模块：一项提议。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):664-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.664.
5
Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.共同决策与 equipoise 的概念：让患者参与医疗选择的能力。
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):892-9.
6
What is a prescribing error?什么是处方错误？
Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.232.
7
The elderly in five nations: the importance of universal coverage.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):226-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.226.
8
The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.绩效数据的公开发布：我们期望获得什么？证据综述。
JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1866-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.14.1866.
9
Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making.医患关于药物的沟通：共同决策的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(6):829-40. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00376-7.
10
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.面向面临健康治疗或筛查决策的患者的决策辅助工具：系统评价
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731.
Zotero 插件