Montgomery L D
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976 Jan;47(1):33-8.
Empirical values of finger blood flow, determined with a commercial electrical impedance device, were compared with blood flow measurements made with a pulsatile air displacement plethysmograph. The measurements were made on the medial phalanges of the first, second, and third fingers of the left and right hands. Blood flow indices were calculated from extrapolated slopes of the recorded impedance and mechanical changes occurring during systole. Two series of observations were made on seven healthy male subjects. The first series consisted of 33 simultaneous measurements with the impedance rheograph and the air displacement plethysmograph on the same finger segment. In the second series of experiments, 16 measurements were made on comparable segments with the rheograph on one side of the body and the air displacement plethysmograph on the other side. The positions of the mechanical and electrical transducers were then exchanged and the procedure repeated. The right and left results were then averaged for each of the two flow measurement systems. Blood flow indices, determined with the impedance rheograph, were consistently 30% lower than those obtained with the air displacement system. The overall mean (+/- S.E.) for the impedance to air displacement blood flow ratio for the first series of measurements was 0.69 +/- 0.03 (range = 0.46 to 1.02). The mean (+/- S.E.) impedance to air displacement ratio for the second series of experiments was 0.68 +/- 0.06 (range = 0.30 to 1.14).
用商用电阻抗装置测定的手指血流量的经验值,与用搏动性空气容积描记器进行的血流量测量结果进行了比较。测量是在左手和右手的第一、第二和第三指的中节指骨上进行的。血流量指数是根据记录的阻抗和收缩期发生的机械变化的外推斜率计算得出的。对7名健康男性受试者进行了两组观察。第一组包括在同一手指节段同时用阻抗血流图仪和空气容积描记器进行33次测量。在第二组实验中,在身体一侧用血流图仪,另一侧用空气容积描记器对可比节段进行了16次测量。然后交换机械和电传感器的位置并重复该过程。然后将两个血流测量系统的左右结果分别求平均值。用阻抗血流图仪测定的血流量指数始终比用空气容积系统获得的指数低30%。第一组测量中阻抗与空气容积血流量比的总体平均值(±标准误)为0.69±0.03(范围=0.46至1.02)。第二组实验中阻抗与空气容积比的平均值(±标准误)为0.68±0.06(范围=0.30至1.14)。