• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成绩单对健康保险市场中消费者选择的影响。

The effect of report cards on consumer choice in the health insurance market.

作者信息

Wedig Gerard J, Tai-Seale Ming

机构信息

William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1031-48. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00075-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00075-9
PMID:12475124
Abstract

We test the effect of report cards on consumer choice in the HMO market. Federal employees were provided with report cards on a limited basis in 1995 and then on a widespread basis in 1996. Exploiting this natural experiment, we find that subjective measures of quality and coverage influence plan choices, after controlling for plan premiums, expected out of pocket expenses and service coverages. The effect is stronger within a small sample of new hires compared to a larger sample of existing federal employees. We also find evidence that report cards increase the price elasticity of demand for health insurance.

摘要

我们测试了报告卡对健康维护组织(HMO)市场中消费者选择的影响。1995年,联邦雇员在有限范围内获得了报告卡,1996年则在广泛范围内获得。利用这一自然实验,我们发现,在控制了计划保费、预期自付费用和服务覆盖范围后,质量和覆盖范围的主观衡量指标会影响计划选择。与现有联邦雇员的较大样本相比,新雇员的小样本中的这种影响更强。我们还发现有证据表明,报告卡提高了医疗保险需求的价格弹性。

相似文献

1
The effect of report cards on consumer choice in the health insurance market.成绩单对健康保险市场中消费者选择的影响。
J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1031-48. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00075-9.
2
Impact of report cards on employees: a natural experiment.员工绩效报告卡的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Fall;20(1):5-27.
3
The impact of health plan report cards on managed care enrollment.健康计划成绩单对管理式医疗参保率的影响。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):19-41. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00111-4.
4
Testing the effect of quality reports on the health plan choices of Medicare beneficiaries.
Inquiry. 2002;39(4):355-71. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.4.355.
5
Employer health insurance offerings and employee enrollment decisions.雇主提供的健康保险及员工的参保决策。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1259-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00415.x.
6
Premiums, benefits, and employee choice of health insurance options.医疗保险选项的保费、福利及员工选择
J Health Econ. 1989 Dec;8(3):293-311. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(89)90023-4.
7
Assessing the impact of health plan choice.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jan-Feb;20(1):267-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.1.267.
8
Quality information and consumer health plan choices.质量信息与消费者健康计划选择。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):43-63. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00126-6.
9
Be on the lookout.
Hosp Health Netw. 1999 Apr;73(4):56-8, 60.
10
Upstream or downstream. Determinants of consumer willingness to recommend an HMO.上游还是下游。消费者推荐健康维护组织意愿的决定因素。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2003 Apr-Jun;26(2):175-80. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200304000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Based Medicine and Healthcare Quality in the Context of Information Failure: The Case of the UK Fertility Sector.信息失灵背景下的循证医学与医疗质量:以英国生育领域为例
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Dec;5(4):561-576. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00285-4. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Patient selection in the presence of regulatory oversight based on healthcare report cards of providers: the case of organ transplantation.在监管监督下基于医疗保健提供者报告卡的患者选择:器官移植的案例。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2021 Mar;24(1):160-184. doi: 10.1007/s10729-020-09530-4. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.
医疗质量会影响患者对医生的选择吗?来自英国的证据。
Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):445-494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
Patient Navigators and Parent Use of Quality Data: A Randomized Trial.患者导航员与家长对质量数据的使用:一项随机试验
Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1140. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
Changes in Consumer Demand Following Public Reporting of Summary Quality Ratings: An Evaluation in Nursing Homes.公共报告总结质量评级后消费者需求的变化:养老院的一项评估
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1291-309. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12459. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
6
Nursing home 5-star rating system exacerbates disparities in quality, by payer source.养老院五星级评级系统按付款方来源加剧了质量差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May;34(5):819-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1084.
7
Switching health insurers: the role of price, quality and consumer information search.更换健康保险公司:价格、质量与消费者信息搜索的作用
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):339-53. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0681-1. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.患者对药学质量措施的感知价值:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 19;5(1):e006086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006086.
9
Differences in price elasticities of demand for health insurance: a systematic review.医疗保险需求价格弹性的差异:系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):5-21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0650-0. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
10
Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.公开绩效数据对改变医疗保健消费者、专业人员或组织的行为所产生的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD004538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub2.