• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道德判断是如何(以及在何处)起作用的?

How (and where) does moral judgment work?

作者信息

Greene Joshua, Haidt Jonathan

机构信息

Dept of Psychology, Green Hall, Princeton University, 08544-1010, Princeton, NJ, USA

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Dec 1;6(12):517-523. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9.

DOI:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9
PMID:12475712
Abstract

Moral psychology has long focused on reasoning, but recent evidence suggests that moral judgment is more a matter of emotion and affective intuition than deliberate reasoning. Here we discuss recent findings in psychology and cognitive neuroscience, including several studies that specifically investigate moral judgment. These findings indicate the importance of affect, although they allow that reasoning can play a restricted but significant role in moral judgment. They also point towards a preliminary account of the functional neuroanatomy of moral judgment, according to which many brain areas make important contributions to moral judgment although none is devoted specifically to it.

摘要

长期以来,道德心理学一直专注于推理,但最近的证据表明,道德判断更多地是情感和情感直觉的问题,而非审慎推理。在此,我们讨论心理学和认知神经科学的最新研究成果,包括几项专门研究道德判断的研究。这些研究结果表明了情感的重要性,尽管它们承认推理在道德判断中可以发挥有限但重要的作用。它们还指向了道德判断功能神经解剖学的初步解释,据此,许多脑区对道德判断都有重要贡献,尽管没有一个脑区专门负责道德判断。

相似文献

1
How (and where) does moral judgment work?道德判断是如何(以及在何处)起作用的?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Dec 1;6(12):517-523. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9.
2
The role of emotion regulation in moral judgment.情绪调节在道德判断中的作用。
Neuroethics. 2018 Oct;11(3):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s12152-016-9261-z. Epub 2016 May 5.
3
Moral reasoning: hints and allegations.道德推理:暗示与指控。
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;2(3):511-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01096.x. Epub 2010 May 13.
4
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.情感之犬及其理性之尾:道德判断的社会直觉主义方法
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814.
5
The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.有意识推理和直觉在道德判断中的作用:检验伤害的三条原则。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1082-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x.
6
Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning.文化与道德推理中普遍原则的追求。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Jun 1;46(3):161-76. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.568486.
7
An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.一项关于道德判断中情感参与的功能磁共振成像研究。
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872.
8
The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.道德判断中认知冲突与控制的神经基础。
Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027.
9
Liberating reason from the passions: overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotion reappraisal.从激情中解放理性:通过情绪再评估来克服直觉主义道德判断。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):788-95. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434747. Epub 2012 May 25.
10
Emotion and moral judgment.情绪与道德判断。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;4(2):169-178. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1216. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Jurymen Seldom Rule Against a Person That They Like: The Relationship Between Emotions Towards a Defendant, the Understanding of Case Facts, and Juror Judgments in Civil Trials.陪审员很少会对他们喜欢的人做出不利裁决:民事审判中对被告的情感、对案件事实的理解与陪审员判决之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;15(7):965. doi: 10.3390/bs15070965.
2
Moral judgments influence emotional responses and comment lengths through the moderating role of linguistic style matching.道德判断通过语言风格匹配的调节作用影响情绪反应和评论长度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07079-2.
3
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.
临床伦理咨询决策中的情感反应:一项探索性研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.
4
Impact of brain damage on moral judgment.脑损伤对道德判断的影响。
PCN Rep. 2025 Jun 20;4(2):e70126. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70126. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Validation of the Russian version of the realistic moral vignettes for studies of moral judgments.用于道德判断研究的俄罗斯版现实道德 vignettes 的验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 30;57(7):184. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02709-z.
6
Minimum levels of interpretability for artificial moral agents.人工道德主体的最低可解释性水平。
AI Ethics. 2025;5(3):2071-2087. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00536-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
'It's not just immoral!': The role of moral disengagement and incivility in dehumanising the transgressor of immoral behaviour.“这不仅仅是不道德的!”:道德推脱和不文明行为在将不道德行为的违规者非人化过程中的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322212. eCollection 2025.
8
Empathy and moral judgment: Systematic review and meta-analysis of ERP studies.共情与道德判断:ERP研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01287-z.
9
Does Cognitive Load Influence Moral Judgments? The Role of Action-Omission and Collective Interests.认知负荷会影响道德判断吗?作为与不作为及集体利益的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;15(3):361. doi: 10.3390/bs15030361.
10
Overcoming the threat of anti-bias interventions: Combining self-report and psychophysiological measures to capture the process of change.克服反偏见干预措施的威胁:结合自我报告和心理生理测量方法来捕捉变化过程。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0314813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314813. eCollection 2025.