Fesce Riccardo, Giovannardi Stefano, Binda Francesca, Bossi Elena, Peres Antonio
Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Insubria, Via Dunant 3, 21100 Varese, Italy.
J Physiol. 2002 Dec 15;545(3):739-50. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.026823.
Most cotransporters characteristically display two main kinds of electrical activity: in the absence of organic substrate, transient presteady-state currents (I(pre)) are generated by charge relocation during voltage steps; in the presence of substrate, sustained, transport-associated currents (I(tr)) are recorded. Quantitative comparison of these two currents, in Xenopus oocytes expressing the neural GABA cotransporter rGAT1, revealed several unforeseen consistencies between I(pre) and I(tr), in terms of magnitude and kinetic parameters. The decay rate constant (r) of I(pre) and the quantity of charge displaced to an inner position in the transporter (Q(in)(0)) depended on voltage and ionic conditions. Saturating GABA concentrations, applied under the same conditions, suppressed I(pre) (i.e. Q(in)( infinity ) = 0) and produced a transport-associated current with amplitude I(tr) = Q(in)(0)r. At non-saturating levels of GABA, changes of I(tr) were compensated by corresponding variations in Q(in), such that I(pre) and I(tr) complemented each other, according to the relation: I(tr) = (Q(in)(0) - Q(in)) r. Complementarity of magnitude, superimposable kinetic properties and equal dependence on voltage and Na(+) point to the uniqueness of the charge carrier for both processes, suggesting that transport and charge migration arise from the same molecular mechanism. The observed experimental relations were correctly predicted by a simple three-state kinetic model, in which GABA binding takes place after charge binding and inward migration have occurred. The model also predicts the observed voltage dependence of the apparent affinity of the transporter for GABA, and suggests a voltage-independent GABA binding rate with a value around 0.64 microM(-1) s(-1).
在没有有机底物的情况下,电压阶跃期间电荷重新分布会产生瞬态预稳态电流(I(pre));在有底物存在时,会记录到持续的、与转运相关的电流(I(tr))。在表达神经GABA协同转运蛋白rGAT1的非洲爪蟾卵母细胞中,对这两种电流进行定量比较,发现在I(pre)和I(tr)之间,在幅度和动力学参数方面存在一些意想不到的一致性。I(pre)的衰减速率常数(r)以及转运蛋白中向内部位置位移的电荷量(Q(in)(0))取决于电压和离子条件。在相同条件下施加饱和GABA浓度会抑制I(pre)(即Q(in)(无穷大)=0),并产生幅度为I(tr)=Q(in)(0)r的与转运相关的电流。在非饱和GABA水平下,I(tr)的变化由Q(in)的相应变化补偿,使得I(pre)和I(tr)相互补充,根据以下关系:I(tr)=(Q(in)(0)-Q(in))r。幅度的互补性、可叠加的动力学特性以及对电压和Na⁺的同等依赖性表明这两个过程的电荷载体具有唯一性,这表明转运和电荷迁移源于相同的分子机制。一个简单的三态动力学模型正确地预测了观察到的实验关系,在该模型中,GABA结合发生在电荷结合和向内迁移之后。该模型还预测了观察到的转运蛋白对GABA的表观亲和力的电压依赖性,并表明GABA结合速率与电压无关,值约为0.64μM⁻¹ s⁻¹。