Xi Guohua, Keep Richard F, Hoff Julian T
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, MC, TC 2128, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0338, USA.
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;13(3):371-83. doi: 10.1016/s1042-3680(02)00007-4.
A number of mechanisms seem to be involved in edema formation after an ICH. At least three phases of edema are involved in ICH. These include a very early phase (first several hours) involving hydrostatic pressure and clot retraction, a second phase (first 2 days) involving the activation of the coagulation cascade and thrombin production, and a third phase (after 3 days) involving RBC lysis and hemoglobin-induced neuronal toxicity. Activation of the complement system in brain parenchyma also plays an important role in the second and third phases. There are potential therapeutic strategies to address each of these mechanisms. Because the adverse effect of an ICH seems to result from a toxic effect of blood components on brain tissue, early clot removal may be the best strategy, because it results in the removal of all the toxic components [93]. Hematoma aspiration after tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) infusion has also been shown to be relatively safe and effective in animal models. Kaufman et al [94] reported that tPA lysed the hematoma in minutes and did not cause inflammation or bleeding in rabbits. Because clots lysed with tPA can be aspirated through a needle or catheter, mechanical brain injury by this method is minimized. In a rat model, aspiration of clot with tPA reduced clot volume and brain injury [95,96]. Recently, Wagner et al [97] infused tPA into hematomas in a porcine model at 3 hours after induction and aspirated the liquified clots 1 hour later. Clot removal after tPA treatment resulted in a 72% reduction in hematoma volume compared with untreated controls. Clot removal also reduced brain edema volume and BBB disruption and improved cerebral tissue pressure [93]. Six randomized trials have been accomplished, but surgical evacuation of the clot remains controversial [98-103]. Recently, thrombolysis and aspiration under CT guidance reduced the hematoma volume effectively [104]. Infusion of tPA directly into the hematoma before clot aspiration has also been used in human beings. Up to 90% of the original hematoma volume can be removed [105, 106]. Schaller et al [107] injected tPA directly into a hematoma 72 hours after the ictus in patients. The hematomas were lysed, and the liquified clots were drained in 14 patients. Two patients died, but none had recurrent hemorrhage. In conclusion, much has been learned about the basic mechanisms involved in edema formation after ICH. Animal models indicate that a number of components of blood are capable of inducing brain injury and brain edema. Now, it is time to translate that basic information into clinical trials.
脑出血后水肿形成似乎涉及多种机制。脑出血至少涉及三个水肿阶段。这些阶段包括:非常早期阶段(最初数小时),涉及流体静压和血凝块回缩;第二阶段(最初2天),涉及凝血级联反应激活和凝血酶产生;第三阶段(3天后),涉及红细胞溶解和血红蛋白诱导的神经元毒性。脑实质中补体系统的激活在第二和第三阶段也起重要作用。针对这些机制中的每一种都有潜在的治疗策略。由于脑出血的不良影响似乎源于血液成分对脑组织的毒性作用,早期清除血凝块可能是最佳策略,因为这会清除所有有毒成分[93]。在动物模型中,组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)输注后进行血肿抽吸也已显示相对安全有效。考夫曼等人[94]报告称,tPA在数分钟内就能溶解血肿,且不会在兔子身上引起炎症或出血。由于用tPA溶解的血凝块可通过针或导管吸出,这种方法造成的机械性脑损伤最小化。在大鼠模型中,用tPA抽吸血凝块可减少血凝块体积和脑损伤[95,96]。最近,瓦格纳等人[97]在诱导后3小时将tPA注入猪模型的血肿中,并在1小时后抽吸液化的血凝块。与未治疗的对照组相比,tPA治疗后清除血凝块使血肿体积减少了72%。清除血凝块还减少了脑水肿体积和血脑屏障破坏,并改善了脑组织压力[93]。已经完成了六项随机试验,但血凝块的手术清除仍存在争议[98 - 103]。最近,CT引导下的溶栓和抽吸有效减少了血肿体积[104]。在人体中也已采用在血凝块抽吸前直接将tPA注入血肿的方法。高达90% 的原始血肿体积可被清除[105, 106]。沙勒等人[107]在患者发病72小时后将tPA直接注入血肿。14例患者的血肿被溶解,液化的血凝块被引流。2例患者死亡,但均未发生再出血。总之,关于脑出血后水肿形成所涉及的基本机制我们已经了解很多。动物模型表明,血液中的许多成分都能够诱导脑损伤和脑水肿。现在,是时候将这些基础信息转化为临床试验了。