Ordóñez-Rubiano Edgar G, Figueredo Luisa F, Gamboa-Oñate Carlos A, Kehayov Ivo, Rengifo-Hipus Jorge A, Romero-Castillo Ingrid J, Rodríguez-Medina Angie P, Patiño-Gomez Javier G, Zorro Oscar
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de San José - Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, Bogota, Colombia.
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Jul 8;13:295. doi: 10.25259/SNI_59_2022. eCollection 2022.
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a lifesaving procedure, relieving intracranial hypertension. Conventionally, DCs are performed by a reverse question mark (RQM) incision. However, the use of the L. G. Kempe's (LGK) incision has increased in the last decade. We aim to describe the surgical nuances of the LGK and the standard RQM incisions to treat patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), empyema, and malignant ischemic stroke. Furthermore, to describe, surgical limitations, wound healing, and neurological outcomes related to each technique.
To describe a prospective acquired, case series including patients who underwent a DC using either an RQM or an LGK incision in our institution between 2019 and 2020.
A total of 27 patients underwent DC. Of those, ten patients were enrolled. The mean age was 42.1 years (26-71), and 60% were male. Five patients underwent DC using a large RQM incision; three had severe TBI, one ICH, and one ischemic stroke. The other five patients underwent DC using an LGK incision (one ICH, one subdural empyema, and one ischemic stroke). About 50% of patients presented severe headaches associated with vomiting, and six presented altered mental status (drowsy or stuporous). Motor deficits were present in four cases. In patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, symptoms were directly related to the stroke location. Hospital stays varied between 13 and 22 days. No readmissions were recorded, and no fatal outcome was documented during the follow-up.
The utility of the LGK incision is comparable with the classic RQM incision to treat acute brain injuries, where an urgent decompression must be performed. Some of these cases include malignant ischemic strokes, ICH, and empyema. No differences were observed between both techniques in terms of prevention of scalp necrosis and general cosmetic outcomes.
减压性颅骨切除术(DC)是一种挽救生命的手术,可缓解颅内高压。传统上,DC手术采用反问号(RQM)切口进行。然而,在过去十年中,L.G.肯佩(LGK)切口的使用有所增加。我们旨在描述LGK切口和标准RQM切口在治疗重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、颅内出血(ICH)、脑脓肿和恶性缺血性中风患者时的手术细微差别。此外,描述每种技术相关的手术局限性、伤口愈合情况和神经功能结局。
描述一项前瞻性病例系列研究,纳入2019年至2020年在我们机构接受DC手术,采用RQM或LGK切口的患者。
共有27例患者接受了DC手术。其中,10例患者被纳入研究。平均年龄为42.1岁(26 - 71岁),60%为男性。5例患者采用大RQM切口进行DC手术;3例患有重度TBI,1例患有ICH,1例患有缺血性中风。另外5例患者采用LGK切口进行DC手术(1例ICH,1例硬膜下脑脓肿,1例缺血性中风)。约50%的患者出现伴有呕吐的严重头痛,6例出现精神状态改变(嗜睡或昏迷)。4例出现运动功能障碍。在缺血性或出血性中风患者中,症状与中风部位直接相关。住院时间在13至22天之间。随访期间未记录再次入院情况,也未记录到致命结局。
在治疗必须进行紧急减压的急性脑损伤时,LGK切口的效用与经典RQM切口相当。这些病例包括恶性缺血性中风、ICH和脑脓肿。在预防头皮坏死和总体美容效果方面,两种技术之间未观察到差异。