• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:老年患者的安全选择

Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients.

作者信息

Law Wai Lun, Chu Kin Wah, Tung Peter Hiu Ming

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Dec;195(6):768-73. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01483-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01483-7
PMID:12495308
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open colorectal surgery in the elderly has been associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. The favorable short-term outcomes of laparosocopic colorectal resection might reduce the morbidity in elderly patients. This study compares results of elderly patients (aged 70 and above) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with those having open surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive patients aged 70 and above who had elective colorectal resection from June 2000 to December 2001 were included. Data concerning demographics, diseases, details of operations, and postoperative events were collected prospectively. Comparisons between results of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery were made.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients had laparoscopic colectomy and 89 had open surgery during the study period. Median ages were 77 years and 75 years in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Presence of premorbid medical conditions, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and incidence of previous surgery were similar in the two groups. Median operative time was longer (180 minutes versus 135 minutes, p < 0.001), but blood loss was less (100 mL versus 200 mL, p = 0.001) in the laparoscopic group. Conversion to open surgery occurred in eight patients. One patient died in the laparoscopic group and five died in the open group. Laparoscopic resection was associated with earlier return of bowel function (3 days versus 4 days, p = 0.004), earlier resumption of solid diet (3 days versus 5 days, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (7 days versus 9 days, p = 0.001), and less cardiopulmonary morbidity (7.7% versus 22.4%, p = 0.033) when compared with open colorectal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic colorectal resection is a safe option for elderly patients and is associated with more favorable short-term outcomes in terms of earlier return of bowel function, earlier resumption of diet, and shorter hospital stay. It is also associated with less cardiopulmonary morbidity, which is an important complication after colorectal surgery in the elderly.

摘要

背景

老年患者的开放性结直肠手术与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。腹腔镜结直肠切除术良好的短期疗效可能会降低老年患者的发病率。本研究比较了接受腹腔镜结直肠切除术的老年患者(70岁及以上)与接受开放性手术的患者的结果。

研究设计

纳入2000年6月至2001年12月期间接受择期结直肠切除术的70岁及以上连续患者。前瞻性收集有关人口统计学、疾病、手术细节和术后事件的数据。对腹腔镜手术和开放性手术的结果进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,65例患者接受了腹腔镜结肠切除术,89例接受了开放性手术。开放性手术组和腹腔镜手术组的中位年龄分别为77岁和75岁。两组患者的病前合并症情况、美国麻醉医师协会评分和既往手术发生率相似。腹腔镜手术组的中位手术时间较长(180分钟对135分钟,p<0.001),但失血量较少(100 mL对200 mL,p=0.001)。8例患者转为开放性手术。腹腔镜手术组有1例患者死亡,开放性手术组有5例患者死亡。与开放性结直肠切除术相比,腹腔镜切除术与肠道功能恢复更早(3天对4天,p=0.004)、固体饮食恢复更早(3天对5天,p<0.001)、住院时间更短(7天对9天,p=0.001)以及心肺并发症更少(7.7%对22.4%,p=0.033)相关。

结论

腹腔镜结直肠切除术对老年患者是一种安全的选择,在肠道功能恢复更早、饮食恢复更早和住院时间更短方面具有更有利的短期疗效。它还与较少的心肺并发症相关,这是老年患者结直肠手术后的一种重要并发症。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:老年患者的安全选择
J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Dec;195(6):768-73. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01483-7.
2
Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients.腹腔镜结直肠切除术的益处在老年患者中更为明显。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Mar;51(3):296-300. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9124-0. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
3
Laparoscopic-assisted colon and rectal surgery - lessons learnt from early experience.腹腔镜辅助结肠和直肠手术——早期经验教训
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005 Apr;34(3):223-8.
4
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
5
Laparoscopic assisted colectomy: experience from a rural centre.腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术:来自农村中心的经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2007 Apr;77(4):283-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04034.x.
6
Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon.腹腔镜与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):76-80.
7
Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术对手术结果和生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218170.41992.23.
8
Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly.老年患者的腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术
Br J Surg. 1999 Jul;86(7):938-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01160.x.
9
Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠切除术治疗美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3 和 4 患者:微创方法与更快的恢复和降低成本相关。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1280-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0761-3. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
10
[Is age a risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?].[年龄是腹腔镜结直肠手术的危险因素吗?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Jun;136(3):264-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262540. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.EAES/SAGES 关于优化老年人围手术期护理的循证建议和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4104-4126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients.腹腔镜手术在老年妇科手术中的优势。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Mar;67(2):243-252. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23238. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Practical considerations for colorectal cancer screening in older adults.
老年人结直肠癌筛查的实际考量
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun 15;14(6):1086-1102. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i6.1086.
4
Decreasing Postoperative Pulmonary Complication Following Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Individuals with Colorectal Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis in a Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.降低老年结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术后的肺部并发症:倾向评分加权队列研究中的竞争风险分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;14(1):131. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010131.
5
What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?对于75岁及以上的成年人,我们应该推荐哪些结直肠癌筛查方法?
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jul 9;28(4):2540-2547. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040231.
6
Analysis of ileostomy stool samples reveals dysbiosis in patients with high-output stomas.对回肠造口术粪便样本的分析显示,高输出量造口患者存在肠道菌群失调。
Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2021;40(3):135-143. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.2020-062. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for elderly rectal cancer patients in Japan: a nationwide study.日本老年直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性:一项全国性研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab007.
8
Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome.腹腔镜手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的优势,不影响肿瘤学结果。
BMC Surg. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00967-6.
9
Minimally invasive surgery in the geriatric patient with colon cancer.老年结肠癌患者的微创手术
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Jun;11(3):540-544. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2020.02.02.
10
Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position.直肠癌机器人手术后因截石位时间延长导致肌酸激酶升高。
BMC Surg. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00771-2.