• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌

Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon.

作者信息

Tong Daniel K H, Law Wai Lun

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):76-80.

PMID:17651561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3015791/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic resection (LR) with open resection (OR) for right-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

During the study period from June 2000 to December 2004, 182 patients (84 men) underwent elective resection for cancer of the right colon. Laparoscopic resection was performed in 77 patients, while 105 patients had open operations. Patients who underwent operations on an emergency basis were excluded. Data on the patients' demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were collected prospectively. The outcomes of patients with laparoscopic resection were compared with those of patients with open surgery.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the age, sex, presence of premorbid medical conditions, and blood loss between the 2 groups. The mean operative time for open resection was 115.4 minutes and that for laparoscopic resection was 165.1 minutes (P<0.001). Among the 77 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection, 7 (9%) required conversion to an open operation. There was no difference in postoperative surgically related complications including wound infection, leakage, intestinal obstruction, postoperative ileus. Nonsurgical-related complications were also similar. The median time to resumption of a normal diet was 3 days and 4 days in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. The median hospital stay in patients with laparoscopic resection was significantly shorter than in patients with open surgery (6.0 days vs 7.0 days, P<0.001). The 2-year overall survival rates were 74% in both groups (P=0.904). In the converted to open (LCOR) group, the hospital stay was significantly longer (LR vs OR vs LCOR, 5.5 days vs 7.0 days vs 9.0 days respectively, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is a safe option for cancers of the right colon. It is associated with a shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of a normal diet. Mortality and morbidity are similar to that with the open approach. There is no compromise in the survival of patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较腹腔镜切除术(LR)与开放切除术(OR)治疗右侧结肠癌的疗效。

方法

在2000年6月至2004年12月的研究期间,182例患者(84例男性)接受了择期右侧结肠癌切除术。77例患者接受了腹腔镜切除术,105例患者接受了开放手术。排除急诊手术患者。前瞻性收集患者的人口统计学数据、手术细节和术后并发症。比较腹腔镜切除术患者与开放手术患者的疗效。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、术前合并症情况和失血量无差异。开放切除术的平均手术时间为115.4分钟,腹腔镜切除术的平均手术时间为165.1分钟(P<0.001)。在77例接受腹腔镜切除术的患者中,7例(9%)需要转为开放手术。术后手术相关并发症包括伤口感染、渗漏、肠梗阻、术后肠梗阻无差异。非手术相关并发症也相似。腹腔镜组和开放组恢复正常饮食的中位时间分别为3天和4天。腹腔镜切除术患者的中位住院时间明显短于开放手术患者(6.0天对7.0天,P<0.001)。两组的2年总生存率均为74%(P=0.904)。在转为开放手术(LCOR)组中,住院时间明显更长(LR组、OR组和LCOR组分别为5.5天、7.0天和9.0天,P<0.001)。

结论

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术是治疗右侧结肠癌的安全选择。它与较短的住院时间和较早恢复正常饮食有关。死亡率和发病率与开放手术相似。患者的生存率没有受到影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/3015791/05c6f640b211/jsls-11-1-76-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/3015791/05c6f640b211/jsls-11-1-76-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/3015791/05c6f640b211/jsls-11-1-76-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon.腹腔镜与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):76-80.
2
The short-term and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 colon cancer.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗T4期结肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1508-18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4364-x. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically-assisted vs. transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study.腹腔镜辅助与横切口开放右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的短期疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 11;5:49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-49.
4
Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer.腹腔镜与开腹半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌
Surg Endosc. 2002 Apr;16(4):596-602. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9053-2. Epub 2002 Jan 9.
5
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
6
Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes.急诊腹腔镜辅助与开放右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌梗阻:短期临床结局的比较研究
World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):454-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9400-0.
7
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:前 100 例切除。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.
8
[Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs. open technique].结肠癌右半结肠切除术:一项比较腹腔镜与开放技术的前瞻性随机研究
Chir Ital. 2008 Jan-Feb;60(1):1-7.
9
Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:老年患者的安全选择
J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Dec;195(6):768-73. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01483-7.
10
A Case-matched Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Colonic Resection for Colon Cancer: Developing Country Perspectives.腹腔镜与开腹右半结肠癌根治术的病例对照研究:发展中国家的观点。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Jul 29;31(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000843.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for patients ≥ 65 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.≥65岁患者机器人辅助与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期结局的比较:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 4;19(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02222-7.
2
Factors Associated With Prolonged Operative Times in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Its Association With Short-Term Outcomes.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术手术时间延长的相关因素及其与短期结局的关联
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;131(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/jso.27872. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomoses in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Single-Center Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: 11-year experience.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗癌症:11年经验
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Aug;69 Suppl 1:65-72.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer.腹腔镜结肠癌和直肠癌手术
Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:93-9.
3
Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma.具有根治性目的的腹腔镜与开放性右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌
腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中体内与体外吻合术:单中心经验
Cureus. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):e44194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44194. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
The value of mesenteric closure after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a scoping review.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术系膜关闭的价值:范围综述。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 17;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02033-3.
5
Procedural and post-operative complications associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗右半结肠癌切除的手术及术后并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022431.
6
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:意大利内镜与新技术外科学会(SICE)网络对1225例病例进行的前瞻性试验,比较体内与体外回肠-结肠侧侧吻合术。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4788-4800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07255-2. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
7
Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes in Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personal Experience in a Single Institution.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗非转移性结直肠癌的肿瘤学结局比较:单机构个人经验
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 19;8(6):875. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060875.
8
Initial experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision in Singapore: a case series.新加坡腹腔镜右半结肠切除术完全结肠系膜切除术的初步经验:病例系列。
Singapore Med J. 2019 May;60(5):247-252. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019008. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
9
Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach.右半结肠切除术:一项比较开腹、腹腔镜辅助、全腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术方式的网络荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1020-1032. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6592-3. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Right colectomy: consecutive 100 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique for malignancy. Cumulative experience in a single centre.右半结肠切除术:连续100例接受腹腔镜和机器人技术治疗恶性肿瘤的患者。单一中心的累积经验。
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):151-156. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0599-0. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan 21;11(3):323-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.323.
4
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland--where are we now?英国和爱尔兰的腹腔镜结直肠手术——我们目前处于什么状况?
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;7(1):86-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00682.x.
5
A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与开放右半结肠切除术的病例对照研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Oct;47(10):1675-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0655-3.
6
Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures.腹腔镜结直肠手术能否成为治疗的标准方法?750例手术的回顾与经验
Can J Surg. 2003 Dec;46(6):432-40.
7
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
8
Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术学习曲线的多维度分析:八年结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10):1371-8; discussion 1378-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6752-5.
9
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:100例连续病例系列研究
Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000055270.48242.D2.
10
Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma.腹腔镜手术治疗直肠乙状结肠和直肠癌的前瞻性评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Dec;45(12):1648-54. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-7253-2.