Suppr超能文献

金属和塑料托槽的扭矩承受能力:涉及材料、应用、技术和生物力学

Torque capacity of metal and plastic brackets with reference to materials, application, technology and biomechanics.

作者信息

Gmyrek Henner, Bourauel Christoph, Richter Gert, Harzer Winfried

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Technical University of Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2002 Mar;63(2):113-28. doi: 10.1007/s00056-002-0065-x.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate slot deformation and the equivalent torque capacity of plastic brackets in comparison with those of a metal bracket in vitro and to simulate them under clinical conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

For this purpose the expansion characteristics of the brackets and their resistance to extraoral mechanical loading were compared in in-vitro activating experiments. In a further investigation, the labial crown torque of an upper central incisor was measured in a simulated intraoral clinical situation, using the Orthodontic Measuring and Simulation System (OMSS). Four types of bracket manufactured by Forstadent, Pforzheim, Germany, were tested: the plastic brackets Aesthetik-Line and Brillant, the latter from a previous series (Brillant-old) and from a modified series (Brillant-new), and the metal bracket MINI-MONO. For testing purposes the brackets were torqued with 0.016" x 0.022" (0.41 x 0.56 mm) and 0.018" x 0.022" (0.46 x 0.56 mm) ideal steel archwires (Remanium, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany).

RESULTS

In the activating experiments, significantly higher torque losses and lower torquing moments were registered with both rectangular archwires with the plastic brackets than with the metal bracket. In the simulation tests, significantly higher torquing moments were registered with the metal bracket than with the plastic brackets. The OMSS model approximates the clinical situation, with the torque loss being notably higher than in the in-vitro activating experiments. This is due to the adjacent teeth giving the archwire additional play. In addition, the torquing process of the rectangular wire may deform the archwire, resulting in subsidiary forces.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the present results, the Brillant and Aesthetik-Line plastic brackets and the MINI-MONO metal bracket can be recommended for torquing. In view of the high torque losses, however, the torques programmed in the straight wire technique must be seen as questionable. It would be helpful to the practitioner if data were provided by the manufacturer on the flexing to be expected in plastic brackets, which has to be offset by additional torque or the possible renunciation of bracket torque.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在体外比较塑料托槽与金属托槽的槽沟变形及等效扭矩承受能力,并在临床条件下进行模拟。

材料与方法

为此,在体外激活实验中比较了托槽的扩展特性及其对外力加载的抵抗力。在进一步的研究中,使用正畸测量与模拟系统(OMSS)在模拟口腔内临床情况下测量了上颌中切牙的唇面冠扭矩。测试了德国普福尔茨海姆的福斯塔登公司生产的四种托槽:塑料托槽Aesthetik-Line和Brillant,后者来自先前系列(旧款Brillant)和改良系列(新款Brillant),以及金属托槽MINI-MONO。为进行测试,使用0.016"×0.022"(0.41×0.56毫米)和0.018"×0.022"(0.46×0.56毫米)的理想不锈钢弓丝(德国伊斯普林根的雷马镍钛丝,登泰克公司)对托槽施加扭矩。

结果

在激活实验中,与金属托槽相比,使用塑料托槽的两种矩形弓丝均出现了明显更高的扭矩损失和更低的施力扭矩。在模拟测试中,金属托槽的施力扭矩明显高于塑料托槽。OMSS模型接近临床情况,扭矩损失明显高于体外激活实验。这是由于相邻牙齿使弓丝有了额外的活动空间。此外,矩形弓丝的施力过程可能会使弓丝变形,从而产生附加力。

结论

基于目前的结果,Brillant和Aesthetik-Line塑料托槽以及MINI-MONO金属托槽可推荐用于施力扭矩。然而,鉴于高扭矩损失,直丝技术中设定的扭矩值得怀疑。如果制造商能提供塑料托槽预期的弯曲数据,这将对从业者有所帮助,因为这种弯曲必须通过额外的扭矩或可能放弃托槽扭矩来抵消。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验