McGann Deborah, Ellis Judi A, Milne Alan
University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, England.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1021-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03194320.
Does prospective remembering rely on strategic, attentionally demanding processes? We report three experiments suggesting that the extent to which attentional processes are required varies according to the character of ongoing task processing. Study-test changes in the semantic context of targets had a negative effect on prospective memory performance when participants were engaged in a conceptually focused (sentence verification) task (Experiment 1). Similarly, prospective remembering was lower following study-test changes in perceptual format (font) in the context of a perceptually focused (readability rating) ongoing task (Experiment 2). However, although dividing attention at retrieval had a negative effect during the performance of an ongoing conceptual task (Experiments 1 and 3), it had no effect during an ongoing perceptual task (Experiments 2 and 3). Thus, both perceptual and conceptual process are implicated in prospective remembering, but the processing focus of the task in which remembering should occur may mediate the requirement for strategic processes. These findings suggest that more than one retrieval route is available for prospective remembering and that selection of the route depends on the nature of the task and the processing that occurs at encoding and retrieval.
前瞻记忆是否依赖于策略性的、需要注意力的过程?我们报告了三项实验,结果表明所需注意力过程的程度会根据正在进行的任务处理的性质而有所不同。当参与者从事概念聚焦(句子验证)任务时,目标语义背景的学习-测试变化对前瞻记忆表现有负面影响(实验1)。同样,在感知聚焦(可读性评级)的正在进行的任务背景下,学习-测试中感知格式(字体)的变化会使前瞻记忆降低(实验2)。然而,尽管在检索时分散注意力在正在进行的概念任务执行过程中有负面影响(实验1和3),但在正在进行的感知任务中却没有影响(实验2和3)。因此,感知和概念过程都与前瞻记忆有关,但记忆发生时任务的处理焦点可能会调节对策略性过程的需求。这些发现表明,前瞻记忆有不止一种检索途径,并且途径的选择取决于任务的性质以及在编码和检索时发生的处理。