• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当对过去的回忆抑制了对未来行动的记忆时。

When remembering the past suppresses memory for future actions.

作者信息

Utsumi Kenta, Saito Satoru

机构信息

a Graduate School of Education , Kyoto University , Kyoto , Japan.

出版信息

Memory. 2016;24(4):437-43. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1015573. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2015.1015573
PMID:25730102
Abstract

Remembering planned actions at the correct time in the future is an integral component of prospective cognition. Recent studies on future remembering have led to suggestions that prospective cognition might be based on past experience. To test this hypothesis, we focused on retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF), which usually indicates that remembering past events suppresses memory for related but different past events. The current study assessed RIF in two kinds of event-based prospective memory (PM) tasks using either focal or non-focal cues for ongoing tasks. Participants studied six members from each of eight taxonomic categories and then practiced recalling three of the six members from four of the eight categories using category-stem cues. This retrieval practice suppressed the detection of non-practiced members of the practiced categories during the PM task with non-focal cues (Experiment 1) but not with focal cues (Experiment 2). The results suggest that recall of certain items inhibits the function of the others as PM cues, but only if the PM task does not largely share its processing with the ongoing task.

摘要

在未来正确的时间记住计划好的行动是前瞻性认知的一个不可或缺的组成部分。最近关于未来记忆的研究表明,前瞻性认知可能基于过去的经验。为了验证这一假设,我们重点研究了提取诱发遗忘(RIF),它通常表明回忆过去的事件会抑制对相关但不同的过去事件的记忆。本研究在两种基于事件的前瞻性记忆(PM)任务中评估了RIF,这两种任务分别使用了正在进行任务中的焦点或非焦点线索。参与者学习了八个分类类别的六个成员,然后使用类别词干线索练习从八个类别中的四个类别中回忆六个成员中的三个。这种提取练习抑制了在使用非焦点线索的PM任务中对已练习类别中未练习成员的检测(实验1),但在使用焦点线索时没有抑制(实验2)。结果表明,回忆某些项目会抑制其他项目作为PM线索的功能,但前提是PM任务与正在进行的任务在很大程度上不共享其处理过程。

相似文献

1
When remembering the past suppresses memory for future actions.当对过去的回忆抑制了对未来行动的记忆时。
Memory. 2016;24(4):437-43. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1015573. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
2
Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.稍等片刻:基于事件的前瞻性记忆中,反应的短暂延迟会降低聚焦效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(7):1432-47. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.750677. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
Remembering the past and imagining the future: examining the consequences of mental time travel on memory.铭记过去,畅想未来:探究心理时间旅行对记忆的后果。
Memory. 2012;20(3):224-35. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.654796. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
4
Remembering the past and imagining the future: Selective effects of an episodic specificity induction on detail generation.回忆过去与想象未来:情景特异性诱导对细节生成的选择性影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(2):285-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.999097. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
5
Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.提取诱发遗忘:一种回忆特异性机制的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):522-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03214366.
6
Low involvement of preexisting associations makes retrieval-induced forgetting long lasting.先前关联的低参与度使得提取诱发遗忘具有持久性。
Cogn Process. 2015 May;16(2):121-30. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0650-8. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
7
Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.提取诱发遗忘:再探竞争性干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1433-48. doi: 10.1037/a0032975. Epub 2013 May 20.
8
Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes.前瞻性记忆的成本控制:自发检索过程的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):190-203. doi: 10.1037/a0017732.
9
Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.先前的任务经验和类似的刺激暴露消除了焦点和非焦点前瞻记忆检索差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):1997-2006. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1217891. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).语境匹配和提取诱发遗忘的线索独立性:检验诺曼、纽曼和德特雷(2007)模型的预测。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):953-8. doi: 10.1037/a0030531. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Thought probes during prospective memory encoding: Evidence for perfunctory processes.前瞻性记忆编码期间的思维探测:敷衍过程的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0198646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198646. eCollection 2018.