• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分散注意力和间接记忆测试。

Divided attention and indirect memory tests.

作者信息

Mulligan N W, Hartman M

机构信息

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):453-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03200934.

DOI:10.3758/bf03200934
PMID:8757494
Abstract

Attentional state during acquisition is an important determinant of performance on direct memory tests. In two experiments we investigated the effects of dividing attention during acquisition on conceptually driven and data-driven indirect memory tests. Subjects read a list of words with or without distraction. Memory for the words was later tested with an indirect memory test or a direct memory test that differed only in task instructions. In Experiment 1, the indirect test was category-exemplar production (a conceptually driven task) and the direct test was category-cued recall. In Experiment 2, the indirect test was word-fragment completion (a data-driven task) and the direct test was word-fragment cued recall. Dividing attention at encoding decreased performance on both direct memory tests. Of the indirect tests, category-exemplar production but not word-fragment completion was affected. The results indicate that conceptually driven indirect memory tests, like direct memory tests, are affected by divided attention, whereas data-driven indirect tests are not. These results are interpreted within the transfer-appropriate processing framework.

摘要

习得过程中的注意状态是直接记忆测试表现的一个重要决定因素。在两项实验中,我们研究了习得过程中注意力分散对概念驱动和数据驱动的间接记忆测试的影响。受试者在有或无干扰的情况下阅读一组单词。随后,通过间接记忆测试或仅在任务指令上有所不同的直接记忆测试来检验对这些单词的记忆。在实验1中,间接测试是类别范例生成(一项概念驱动任务),直接测试是类别线索回忆。在实验2中,间接测试是单词片段补全(一项数据驱动任务),直接测试是单词片段线索回忆。在编码时分散注意力会降低两项直接记忆测试的表现。在间接测试中,类别范例生成受到影响,但单词片段补全不受影响。结果表明,与直接记忆测试一样,概念驱动的间接记忆测试会受到注意力分散的影响,而数据驱动的间接测试则不受影响。这些结果在迁移适当加工框架内进行了解释。

相似文献

1
Divided attention and indirect memory tests.分散注意力和间接记忆测试。
Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):453-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03200934.
2
The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory.数据驱动和概念驱动生成研究项目对记忆的直接和间接测量的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 Feb;48(1):153-65. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401382.
3
Limits of the processing view in accounting for dissociations among memory measures in a clinical population.临床人群中记忆测量指标间分离现象的加工视角解释的局限性。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):63-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03211165.
4
Attention and implicit memory tests: the effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming.注意力与内隐记忆测试:不同注意力负荷对概念启动的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03197281.
5
Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall.内隐记忆测试与外显记忆测试的分离:年龄和注意力分散对类别范例生成及线索回忆的影响
Mem Cognit. 1995 Jul;23(4):462-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03197247.
6
Priming and aging: further evidence of preserved memory function.启动与老化:记忆功能保留的进一步证据。
Am J Psychol. 1991 Spring;104(1):89-100.
7
Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.分散注意力对知觉和概念性记忆测试的影响:一项使用过程分离法的分析
Mem Cognit. 1999 May;27(3):512-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03211545.
8
Does organization improve priming?组织会改善启动效应吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Jan;17(1):103-14. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.1.103.
9
A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.对提取诱发遗忘的一种限制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1314-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1314.
10
The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.编码过程中注意力在内隐记忆和外显记忆中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Jan;24(1):27-47. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.1.27.

引用本文的文献

1
Reward Salience and Choice in a Controlling Context: A Lab Experiment.控制性情境下的奖励显著性与选择:一项实验室实验
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:862152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862152. eCollection 2022.
2
Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision.并非所有识别任务都是生来平等的:测试生成过程在知觉识别和词汇判断中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):685-699. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0852-z. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
3
Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.

本文引用的文献

1
Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory.启动效应和多重记忆系统:内隐记忆的知觉机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Summer;4(3):244-56. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.244.
2
Attention and implicit memory tests: the effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming.注意力与内隐记忆测试:不同注意力负荷对概念启动的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03197281.
3
Age differences in implicit memory: more apparent than real.内隐记忆中的年龄差异:看似明显实则不然。
注意分散会降低编码时对分心的抵抗,但不会降低检索时的抵抗。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1268-1273. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1210-7.
4
Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation.内隐记忆中的协作:来自单词片段补全和类别范例生成的证据。
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0725-2. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Does long-term object priming depend on the explicit detection of object identity at encoding?长期的客体启动是否依赖于编码时对客体身份的明确检测?
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 20;6:270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00270. eCollection 2015.
6
Attention and implicit memory: priming-induced benefits and costs have distinct attentional requirements.注意力与内隐记忆:启动效应引发的益处与代价有着不同的注意力要求。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Feb;43(2):216-25. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0464-4.
7
Intact implicit verbal relational memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia.内侧颞叶性遗忘症患者存在完整的内隐言语关系记忆。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):2100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 May 17.
8
Effects of dividing attention during encoding on perceptual priming of unfamiliar visual objects.编码过程中注意力分散对不熟悉视觉对象的知觉启动的影响。
Memory. 2008 Nov;16(8):873-95. doi: 10.1080/09658210802360595. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
9
On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention.关于知觉内隐记忆对注意力操控的免疫性。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):725-34. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.4.725.
10
What do second language listeners know about spoken words? Effects of experience and attention in spoken word processing.第二语言听众对口语单词了解多少?口语单词处理中经验和注意力的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 Sep;37(5):309-29. doi: 10.1007/s10936-008-9069-z. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):73-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03211166.
4
Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests.四种内隐记忆测试的直接比较。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):765-76. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.765.
5
Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control.记忆的自动与有意运用:衰老、注意力与控制
Psychol Aging. 1993 Jun;8(2):283-93. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.283.
6
Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks.表面信息和概念信息对隐性和显性记忆任务表现的贡献。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):864-75. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.4.864.
7
Adult age differences in repetition priming: a meta-analysis.
Psychol Aging. 1994 Dec;9(4):539-53. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.9.4.539.
8
Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition.非自愿有意识记忆与对立方法。
Memory. 1994 Mar;2(1):1-29. doi: 10.1080/09658219408251490.
9
Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.对无法识别的刺激的情感辨别。
Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):557-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7352271.
10
Simulating amnesic symptoms in normal subjects.在正常受试者中模拟失忆症状。
Science. 1982 Dec 17;218(4578):1243-4. doi: 10.1126/science.7146909.