Suppr超能文献

通过源自主动脉血流速度的指标评估左心室功能。

Assessment of left ventricular function by indices derived from aortic flow velocity.

作者信息

Kolettis M, Jenkins B S, Webb-Peploe M M

出版信息

Br Heart J. 1976 Jan;38(1):18-31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.1.18.

Abstract

The velocity and acceleration of aortic blood flow were measured by means of a catheter velocity probe in 40 patients during routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Ten different variables were derived from the aortic velocity measurements, and their ability to discriminate between good and bad left ventricular (LV) function was tested. By means of eight conventional indices of LV function derived from pressure, mean flow, and quantitative cineangiography, the patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1, good LV function; group 2, moderate LV function; group 3, poor LV function. Aortic peak velocity and maximal acceleration correlated well with stroke volume and were thus indices of LV pump function. Aortic peak velocity also showed a significant correlation with LV stroke work. Both aortic peak velocity and maximal acceleration failed to discriminate between the three groups of patients, and correlated poorly with conventional indices of LV function. The mean values of stroke volume differed significantly between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3, and also correlated better with the conventional functional indices. The best discrimination between normal and abnormal LV function was provided by dividing stroke volume by maximal acceleration, but stroke volume divided by peak velocity discriminated better than stroke volume alone. Stroke volume divided by maximal acceleration also gave more significant individual correlations with the conventional functional indices than did any other variable derived from aortic velocity.

摘要

在40例患者进行常规诊断性心导管检查期间,使用导管速度探头测量主动脉血流的速度和加速度。从主动脉速度测量中得出10个不同变量,并测试它们区分左心室(LV)功能好坏的能力。通过从压力、平均流量和定量电影血管造影得出的8个常规LV功能指标,将患者分为3组:第1组,LV功能良好;第2组,LV功能中等;第3组,LV功能较差。主动脉峰值速度和最大加速度与每搏量密切相关,因此是LV泵功能的指标。主动脉峰值速度也与LV每搏功显著相关。主动脉峰值速度和最大加速度均无法区分这三组患者,且与LV功能的常规指标相关性较差。第1组和第2组之间、第1组和第3组之间每搏量的平均值差异显著,并且与常规功能指标的相关性也更好。用每搏量除以最大加速度能最好地区分正常和异常LV功能,但每搏量除以峰值速度的区分效果比单独的每搏量更好。与从主动脉速度得出的任何其他变量相比,每搏量除以最大加速度与常规功能指标的个体相关性也更显著。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Computerised cardiological case notes.计算机化心脏病病例记录。
Br Heart J. 1982 Aug;48(2):169-76. doi: 10.1136/hrt.48.2.169.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验