• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境公平与健康:理解复杂性并向前迈进。

Environmental equity and health: understanding complexity and moving forward.

作者信息

Northridge Mary E, Stover Gabriel N, Rosenthal Joyce E, Sherard Donna

机构信息

Harlem Health Promotion Center, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City 10032, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):209-14. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.209.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.93.2.209
PMID:12554571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1447718/
Abstract

The authors invoke a population health perspective to assess the distribution of environmental hazards according to race/ethnicity, social class, age, gender, and sexuality and the implications of these hazards for health. The unequal burden of environmental hazards borne by African American, Native American, Latino, and Asian American/Pacific Islander communities and their relationship to well-documented racial/ethnic disparities in health have not been critically examined across all population groups, regions of the United States, and ages. The determinants of existing environmental inequities also require critical research attention. To ensure inclusiveness and fill important gaps, scientific evidence is needed on the health effects of the built environment as well as the natural environment, cities and suburbs as well as rural areas, and indoor as well as outdoor pollutants.

摘要

作者们运用人口健康视角,根据种族/族裔、社会阶层、年龄、性别和性取向来评估环境危害的分布情况,以及这些危害对健康的影响。非裔美国人、美洲原住民、拉丁裔和亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民社区所承受的环境危害不平等负担,以及它们与已充分记录的健康方面种族/族裔差异之间的关系,尚未在所有人口群体、美国各地区和各年龄段中得到批判性审视。现有环境不平等的决定因素也需要得到批判性研究关注。为确保包容性并填补重要空白,需要有关建筑环境以及自然环境、城市和郊区以及农村地区、室内以及室外污染物对健康影响的科学证据。

相似文献

1
Environmental equity and health: understanding complexity and moving forward.环境公平与健康:理解复杂性并向前迈进。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):209-14. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.209.
2
Sick and tired of being sick and tired: scientific evidence, methods, and research implications for racial and ethnic disparities in occupational health.厌倦了病痛与疲惫:职业健康领域种族和族裔差异的科学证据、方法及研究启示
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):221-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.221.
3
Practice paper of the American Dietetic Association: addressing racial and ethnic health disparities.美国饮食协会实践文件:解决种族和民族健康差异问题。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Mar;111(3):446-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.01.024.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cumulative Environmental Health Impacts in California: Evidence From a Statewide Environmental Justice Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen 1.1).加利福尼亚州累积环境健康影响中的种族/族裔差异:来自全州环境正义筛查工具(加州环境筛查工具1.1版)的证据
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2341-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302643. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
5
The Institute of Medicine report "Unequal Treatment": implications for academic health centers.医学研究所报告《不平等待遇》:对学术医疗中心的影响。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2004 Oct;71(5):314-21.
6
Health status by social class and/or minority status: implications for environmental equity research.社会阶层和/或少数群体身份的健康状况:对环境公平性研究的启示
Toxicol Ind Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;9(5):729-73. doi: 10.1177/074823379300900505.
7
The concept of race and health status in America.美国的种族与健康状况概念。
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):26-41.
8
Access to health and health care: how race and ethnicity matter.获得健康与医疗保健:种族和族裔的重要性。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;77(2):166-77. doi: 10.1002/msj.20174.
9
Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, Residential Segregation, and Spatial Variation in Noise Exposure in the Contiguous United States.美国本土的种族/族裔、社会经济地位、居住隔离与噪声暴露的空间差异
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 25;125(7):077017. doi: 10.1289/EHP898.
10
Employment discrimination, segregation, and health.就业歧视、隔离与健康。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):226-31. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.226.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional factors affecting the prevalence of hypertension using geographic information system.利用地理信息系统分析影响高血压患病率的区域因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 8;15(1):29087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14981-2.
2
Environmental injustice in the air quality for digital platform delivery workers in Bogotá, Colombia, 2021.2021 年哥伦比亚波哥大数字平台交付工人的空气质量中的环境不公平。
Biomedica. 2024 Aug 29;44(3):391-401. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.7162.
3
Meteorological data source comparison-a case study in geospatial modeling of potential environmental exposure to abandoned uranium mine sites in the Navajo Nation.气象数据源比较——以纳瓦霍族地区废弃铀矿场潜在环境暴露的地理空间建模为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 12;195(7):834. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11283-w.
4
A pilot study of total personal exposure to volatile organic compounds among Hispanic female domestic cleaners.西班牙裔女性家政清洁工挥发性有机化合物个体总暴露量的初步研究。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Jan;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2021.2000615. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
5
Pollution and regional variations of lung cancer mortality in the United States.美国肺癌死亡率的污染情况及区域差异。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;49:118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
An Initial Assessment of a Forgotten Minority Community: Key Informant's Perceptions of Environmental Health in Fresno, Texas.对一个被遗忘的少数族裔社区的初步评估:关键信息提供者对得克萨斯州弗雷斯诺环境卫生的看法。
Calif J Health Promot. 2006 Jan 1;4(1):22-31.
7
Intra-urban vulnerability to heat-related mortality in New York City, 1997-2006.1997 - 2006年纽约市城区内与高温相关死亡率的脆弱性
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
8
Cancer care in East and Central Harlem: community partnership needs assessment.东哈莱姆区和中哈莱姆区的癌症护理:社区伙伴关系需求评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Mar;28(1):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0430-4.
9
Stress during pregnancy: the role of institutional racism.孕期压力:制度性种族主义的作用。
Stress Health. 2013 Oct;29(4):266-74. doi: 10.1002/smi.2462. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
10
Area-based variations in obesity are more than a function of the food and physical activity environment : area-based variations in obesity.肥胖的区域差异不仅仅是食物和身体活动环境的作用:肥胖的区域差异。
J Urban Health. 2013 Jun;90(3):442-63. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9715-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing population health in the Harlem Children's Zone Project.提升哈莱姆儿童区项目中的人群健康水平。
Soz Praventivmed. 2002;47(4):201-2. doi: 10.1007/BF01326396.
2
Clean indoor air: advances in California, 1990-1999.清洁室内空气:1990 - 1999年加利福尼亚州的进展
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):785-91. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.785.
3
Housing and health: time again for public health action.住房与健康:公共卫生行动再度提上日程。
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):758-68. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.758.
4
Housing and health.住房与健康。
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):701. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.701.
5
Deteriorated housing contributes to high cockroach allergen levels in inner-city households.破旧的房屋导致市中心家庭蟑螂过敏原水平升高。
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):323-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2323.
6
Is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency brownfields assessment pilot program environmentally just?美国环境保护局的棕地评估试点项目是否符合环境正义?
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):249-57. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2249.
7
Lead sources, behaviors, and socioeconomic factors in relation to blood lead of native american and white children: a community-based assessment of a former mining area.美国原住民和白人儿童血铅水平相关的铅源、行为及社会经济因素:对一个 former mining area 的社区评估 (注:这里“former mining area”不太明确准确含义,可能是“原矿区”之类的,需结合更多背景信息确定)
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):221-31. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2221.
8
Mapping environmental injustices: pitfalls and potential of geographic information systems in assessing environmental health and equity.绘制环境不公正现象:地理信息系统在评估环境健康与公平性方面的陷阱与潜力
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):161-71. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2161.
9
Environmental justice and regional inequality in southern California: implications for future research.南加州的环境正义与区域不平等:对未来研究的启示
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):149-54. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2149.
10
Colorful communities: toward a language of inclusion.多元社区:迈向包容的语言
Am J Public Health. 2002 Apr;92(4):512-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.4.512.