Bourlet Thomas, Levy Rachel, Laporte Silvy, Blachier Stéphane, Bocket Laurence, Cassuto Guy, Chollet Lionel, Leruez-Ville Marianne, Maertens Anne, Mousnier Fabienne, Pasquier Christophe, Payan Christopher, Pellegrin Bertrand, Schvoerer Evelyne, Zavadzki Patricia, Chouteau Jacques, Duverlie Gilles, Izopet Jacques, Lunel-Fabiani Françoise, Pawlotsky Jean-Michel, Profizi Nerina, Rouzioux Christine, Stoll-Keller Françoise, Thibault Vincent, Wattré Pierre, Pozzetto Bruno
Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Unité de Pharmacologie Clinique, Faculté de Médecine, University of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):789-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.789-793.2003.
The discrepant results available in the literature about the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in seminal plasma of men chronically infected by this agent are related, at least in part, to the molecular techniques used and particularly to the wide range of protocols dedicated to RNA extraction. In order to evaluate these protocols and to standardize the method of detection of HCV RNA in this fluid, a panel of coded specimens was tested blindly in 12 French laboratories; it included 14 seminal plasma specimens and four water controls spiked with HCV RNA ranging from 10 to 20000 IU/ml and two HCV-negative seminal plasma specimens. The extraction step was performed according to methods using either silica beads (NucliSens [Organon Teknika S.A., Fresnes, France]; RNA viral kit [Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France]) or guanidinium thiocyanate (Amplicor HCV assay; Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France), preceded or not by a centrifugation of the seminal plasma. For the amplification step, all the laboratories performed the same reverse transcription-PCR technique (Amplicor HCV Cobas assay). The percentage of correct results ranged from 53.3 to 100, the poorest results being obtained when no centrifugation step preceded the Amplicor extraction protocol. The rate of correct results was significantly higher in laboratories using a preliminary centrifugation of the specimen (P = 0.034 by chi-square test). By contrast, the overall number of correct results was not correlated to the initial volume of sample used for the test. These results allowed us to validate standardized techniques adapted to the performance of this test on a routine basis, especially in men infected with HCV and involved in programs of medically assisted reproduction.
关于慢性感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的男性精液中是否存在HCV RNA,文献中存在相互矛盾的结果,这至少部分与所使用的分子技术有关,尤其是与用于RNA提取的广泛方案有关。为了评估这些方案并标准化该液体中HCV RNA的检测方法,一组编码标本在12个法国实验室进行了盲测;其中包括14份精液标本和4份添加了浓度范围为10至20000 IU/ml HCV RNA的水对照,以及2份HCV阴性精液标本。提取步骤根据使用硅胶珠(NucliSens [Organon Teknika S.A., 法国弗雷讷]; RNA病毒试剂盒 [Qiagen, 法国库尔塔布夫])或硫氰酸胍(Amplicor HCV检测; Roche Diagnostics, 法国梅兰)的方法进行,精液标本在提取前是否进行离心处理均可。对于扩增步骤,所有实验室均采用相同的逆转录 - PCR技术(Amplicor HCV Cobas检测)。正确结果的百分比范围为53.3%至100%,在Amplicor提取方案之前未进行离心步骤时获得的结果最差。在对标本进行初步离心的实验室中,正确结果的比例显著更高(卡方检验P = 0.034)。相比之下,正确结果的总数与用于检测的初始样本体积无关。这些结果使我们能够验证适用于该检测常规操作的标准化技术,特别是在感染HCV并参与医学辅助生殖计划的男性中。