Elung-Jensen Thomas, Heisterberg Jens, Kamper Anne-Lise, Sonne Jesper, Strandgaard Svend
Department of Nephrology, Herlev Hospital, Denmark.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;55(2):139-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01764.x.
In chronic renal failure, the clearance of most ACE inhibitors including enalapril is reduced. Hence, with conventional dosage, plasma enalaprilat may be markedly elevated. It is unclear whether this excess of drug exposure affords an improved control of blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate short-term blood pressure response to two different plasma levels of enalaprilat.
As part of an open, randomized, controlled trial of the effect of high and low dosage of enalapril on the progression of renal failure, short-term blood pressure response was evaluated. Data were analysed in all patients completing 3 months of follow-up. The patients were allocated to two trough plasma concentrations of enalaprilat, either above 50 ng ml(-1) (high) (n = 17) or below 10 ng ml(-1) (low) (n = 18), and the daily dose of enalapril titrated accordingly.
Median (range) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline was 18 (7.9) in the high enalaprilat concentration group and 17 (7.3) ml min(-1) 1.73 m(2) in the low concentration group (NS). Nine patients in each group were on treatment with enalapril at baseline with a median daily dose of 5 mg in both the high (5-10) and low (2.5-20) concentration group. At 3 months' follow-up, the dose was 10 (2.5-30) and 1.9 (1.25-5) mg (P < 0.0001), respectively. After 3 months median trough concentrations of enalaprilat were 82.5 (22-244) ng ml(-1) and 9.1 (2.5-74.8) ng ml(-1) (P < 0.002). At baseline the median systolic blood pressures in the two groups were 140 (110-200) and 133 (110-165), in the high and low enalaprilat concentration groups, respectively, and after 3 months they were 135 (105-170) and 130 (105-170) mmHg (NS). Median diastolic blood pressure was 80 mmHg in each group both at baseline (65-100) and at follow-up (60-95) (NS). There was no difference between the groups in concomitant antihypertensive treatment (number of patients treated, mean daily dose) during the observation period. Proteinuria remained stable during the study period in both groups; patients in the high concentration group had higher plasma potassium concentrations at day 90 and patients in the low group experienced a slight increase in GFR.
In moderate to severe chronic renal insufficiency the same degree of blood pressure control was achieved on low as well as moderate daily doses of enalapril. This was irrespective of concomitant antihypertensive treatment.
在慢性肾衰竭中,包括依那普利在内的大多数血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的清除率都会降低。因此,使用常规剂量时,血浆依那普利拉可能会显著升高。目前尚不清楚这种药物暴露过量是否能更好地控制血压。本研究的目的是评估依那普利拉两种不同血浆水平下的短期血压反应。
作为一项关于高剂量和低剂量依那普利对肾衰竭进展影响的开放、随机、对照试验的一部分,评估了短期血压反应。对所有完成3个月随访的患者的数据进行了分析。患者被分配到依那普利拉的两个谷浓度组,高于50 ng/ml(高浓度组,n = 17)或低于10 ng/ml(低浓度组,n = 18),并相应调整依那普利的每日剂量。
依那普利拉高浓度组基线时肾小球滤过率(GFR)的中位数(范围)为18(7.9),低浓度组为17(7.3)ml·min⁻¹·1.73 m²(无显著性差异)。每组各有9名患者在基线时接受依那普利治疗,高浓度组(5 - 10 mg)和低浓度组(2.5 - 20 mg)的每日剂量中位数均为5 mg。在3个月的随访时,剂量分别为10(2.5 - 30)mg和1.9(1.25 - 5)mg(P < 0.0001)。3个月后,依那普利拉的谷浓度中位数分别为82.5(22 - 244)ng/ml和9.1(2.5 - 74.8)ng/ml(P < 0.002)。基线时,依那普利拉高浓度组和低浓度组的收缩压中位数分别为140(110 - 200)和133(110 - 165)mmHg,3个月后分别为135(105 - 170)和130(105 - 170)mmHg(无显著性差异)。每组的舒张压中位数在基线(65 - 100 mmHg)和随访时(60 - 95 mmHg)均为80 mmHg(无显著性差异)。观察期内,两组在联合使用的抗高血压治疗(治疗患者数量、平均每日剂量)方面没有差异。在研究期间,两组的蛋白尿均保持稳定;高浓度组患者在第90天时血钾浓度较高,低浓度组患者的GFR略有升高。
在中度至重度慢性肾功能不全患者中,低剂量和中等剂量的依那普利均可实现相同程度的血压控制。这与联合使用的抗高血压治疗无关。