Holden Mark, Schnabel Julia A, Hill Derek L G
Radiological Sciences and Medical Engineering, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Oct;21(10):1292-301. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2002.806281.
Nonrigid registration can automatically quantify small changes in volume of anatomical structures over time by means of segmentation propagation. Here, we use a nonrigid registration algorithm based on optimising normalized mutual information to quantify small changes in brain ventricle volume in magnetic resonance (MR) images of a group of five patients treated with growth hormone replacement therapy and a control group of six volunteers. The lateral ventricles are segmented from each subject image by registering with the brainweb image which has this structure delineated. The mean (standard deviation) volume change measurements are 1.09 (0.73) cm3 for the patient group and 0.08 (0.62) cm3 for the volunteer group; this difference is statistically significant at the 1% level. We validate our volume measurements by determining the precision from three consecutive scans of five volunteers and also comparing the measurements to previously published volume change estimates obtained by visual inspection of difference images. Results demonstrate a precision of sigma < or = 0.52 cm3 (n = 5) and a rank correlation coefficient with assessed difference images of p = 0.7 (n = 11). To determine the level of shape correspondence we manually segmented subject's ventricles and compared them to the propagations using a voxel overlap similarity index, this gave a mean similarity index of 0.81 (n = 7).
非刚性配准可以通过分割传播自动量化解剖结构体积随时间的微小变化。在此,我们使用一种基于优化归一化互信息的非刚性配准算法,来量化一组接受生长激素替代疗法的5名患者以及一个由6名志愿者组成的对照组的磁共振(MR)图像中脑室内体积的微小变化。通过与已勾勒出该结构的brainweb图像配准,从每个受试者图像中分割出侧脑室。患者组的平均(标准差)体积变化测量值为1.09(0.73)cm³,志愿者组为0.08(0.62)cm³;这种差异在1%水平上具有统计学意义。我们通过确定5名志愿者连续三次扫描的精度,并将测量结果与之前通过目视检查差异图像获得的体积变化估计值进行比较,来验证我们的体积测量。结果表明精度为σ≤0.52 cm³(n = 5),与评估的差异图像的等级相关系数为p = 0.7(n = 11)。为了确定形状对应程度,我们手动分割受试者的脑室,并使用体素重叠相似性指数将其与传播结果进行比较,得到的平均相似性指数为0.81(n = 7)。