• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of five methods for preparing blood smears.

作者信息

Wenk R E

出版信息

Am J Med Technol. 1976 Mar;42(3):71-8.

PMID:1258894
Abstract

An extensive study was undertaken to compare five methods of blood smear preparation. Three mechanical devices for preparing blood smears were compared to the traditional coverslip and manual wedge methods. A series of five slides was prepared from each sample of blood. One hundred-cell leukocyte differential counts, red cell morphology, and platelet distribution were compared. Differential counts along the axis and margins of each slide failed to reveal any significant distribution difference by method. On the other hand, there were a significantly fewer neutrophils as well as higher lymphocyte counts on the two spinner preparations. Subsequent analysis suggested that spinner preparations create more smudge cells in smears of normal and granulocytic leukemia patients, and significantly fewer smudge cells in smears of lymphocytic leukemia patients. Both spinner methods produced significant increases in erythrocytic target cells, spherocytes, and cells with shifted pallor; and significantly fewer burr cells and ovalocytes, as compared to the reference methods. The mechanical wedge device was most similar to both reference methods. Of the two reference methods, the cumbersome coverslip preparation apparently offers no practical advantage over wedge methods.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of five methods for preparing blood smears.
Am J Med Technol. 1976 Mar;42(3):71-8.
2
Comparison of two platelet count estimation methodologies for peripheral blood smears.外周血涂片两种血小板计数估计方法的比较。
Clin Lab Sci. 2007 Summer;20(3):154-60.
3
Process to evaluate hematological parameters that reflex to manual differential cell counts in a pediatric institution.在一家儿科机构中评估反映手工细胞分类计数的血液学参数的过程。
Clin Lab. 2010;56(1-2):21-7.
4
Physician Education: Myelodysplastic Syndrome.医师教育:骨髓增生异常综合征
Oncologist. 1996;1(4):284-287.
5
The peripheral smear.外周血涂片。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1986 Feb;4(1):59-74.
6
An evaluation of blood smears made by a new method using a spinner and diluted blood.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Dec;70(6):885-92. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/70.6.885.
7
[Benefits of routine automatic blood picture differentiation].[常规自动血细胞图像鉴别之益处]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Mar 16;115(11):373-5.
8
Evaluation of the automated leucocyte count and differential from the Cell-Dyn 3500 in sickle cell disease.对Cell-Dyn 3500全自动白细胞计数及分类在镰状细胞病中的评估。
Clin Lab Haematol. 1995 Dec;17(4):329-33.
9
Inaccuracy and imprecision of reticulocyte counting.网织红细胞计数的不准确与不精密。
Osaka City Med J. 1989 Jun;35(1):39-47.
10
Automation of blood film preparation and staining utilizing the technicon autoslide.
Blood Cells. 1980;6(3):471-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Rare Anemias: Are Their Names Just Smoke and Mirrors?罕见贫血:它们的名称只是障眼法吗?
Front Physiol. 2021 Jun 10;12:690604. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.690604. eCollection 2021.
2
Red blood cell phenotyping from 3D confocal images using artificial neural networks.使用人工神经网络对 3D 共聚焦图像进行红细胞表型分析。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 May 13;17(5):e1008934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008934. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Heterogeneity of Red Blood Cells: Causes and Consequences.红细胞的异质性:原因与后果
Front Physiol. 2020 May 7;11:392. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00392. eCollection 2020.
4
Performance of automated slidemakers and stainers in a working laboratory environment - routine operation and quality control.自动化玻片制备和染色机在工作实验室环境中的性能 - 常规操作和质量控制。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Feb;32(1 Pt 1):e64-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2009.01141.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.