• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对提高非依从性老年女性乳腺钼靶筛查率的定制干预措施比较。

Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women.

作者信息

Champion Victoria, Maraj Maltie, Hui Siu, Perkins Anthony J, Tierney William, Menon Usha, Skinner Celette Sugg

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, 1111 Middle Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):150-8. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00038-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00038-5
PMID:12590989
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent increases in mammography use have led to a decrease in mortality from breast cancer.

METHODS

Building on the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Model, and past effectiveness of tailored interventions, we conducted a prospective randomized trial (n = 773) to test the efficacy on mammography adherence of tailored interventions delivered by five different methods, i.e., telephone counseling, in-person counseling, physician letter, and combinations of telephone with letter and in-person with letter.

RESULTS

All five interventions increased mammography adherence significantly relative to usual care (odds ratios, 1.93 to 3.55) at 6 months post intervention. The combination of in-person with physician letter was significantly more effective than telephone alone or letter alone. Women thinking about getting a mammogram at baseline were more likely to be adherent by 6 months; even those in usual care achieved 48% adherence compared with 50-70% in the intervention groups. In contrast, women not thinking about getting a mammogram needed the interventions to increase their adherence from 13% to over 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

All five interventions were effective at increasing mammography adherence. Women not thinking about getting a mammogram were most likely to benefit from these tailored interventions while other women might need less intensive interventions.

摘要

背景

近期乳腺钼靶检查使用率的上升导致了乳腺癌死亡率的下降。

方法

基于健康信念模型、行为改变阶段理论以及既往个性化干预措施的有效性,我们开展了一项前瞻性随机试验(n = 773),以测试通过五种不同方法提供的个性化干预措施对乳腺钼靶检查依从性的效果,这五种方法分别是电话咨询、面对面咨询、医生信函,以及电话与信函相结合和面对面与信函相结合的方式。

结果

在干预后的6个月时,相对于常规护理,所有五种干预措施均显著提高了乳腺钼靶检查的依从性(优势比为1.93至3.55)。面对面与医生信函相结合的方式比单独使用电话或信函的方式显著更有效。在基线时考虑进行乳腺钼靶检查的女性在6个月时更有可能坚持检查;即使是接受常规护理的女性也达到了48%的依从率,而干预组的依从率为50%至70%。相比之下,未考虑进行乳腺钼靶检查的女性需要这些干预措施将其依从率从13%提高到30%以上。

结论

所有五种干预措施在提高乳腺钼靶检查依从性方面均有效。未考虑进行乳腺钼靶检查的女性最有可能从这些个性化干预措施中受益,而其他女性可能需要强度较低的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women.针对提高非依从性老年女性乳腺钼靶筛查率的定制干预措施比较。
Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):150-8. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00038-5.
2
Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women?量身定制的干预措施能否提高健康维护组织(HMO)女性的乳房X光检查使用率?
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00106-3.
3
A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.三种针对性干预措施提高乳腺钼靶筛查率的成本效益比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Oct;13(8):909-18. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.909.
4
The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中提高乳腺X线摄影依从性的5种干预措施的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jan;9(1):33-44.
5
The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.电话定制与印刷品定制对乳房X光检查依从性的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
6
Comparisons of tailored mammography interventions at two months postintervention.干预后两个月时定制化乳腺钼靶检查干预措施的比较。
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Summer;24(3):211-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_06.
7
Effectiveness of a telephone outcall intervention to promote screening mammography among low-income women.一项通过电话外呼干预来促进低收入女性乳腺钼靶筛查的效果研究。
Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 2):S39-49. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0395.
8
Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.五种增加乳房X光检查筛查率干预措施的成本效益比较
Prev Med. 1999 Nov;29(5):374-82. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0568.
9
A 4-year randomized trial comparing three outreach interventions to promote screening mammograms.一项为期 4 年的随机试验,比较了三种外展干预措施以促进乳房 X 光筛查。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):328-335. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby031.
10
Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.在一大群初级保健人群中实施并进行过程评估的三种促进乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施,为期4年。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacto - A single-arm open-label pilot trial of a digital-based integrated smoking cessation program for Spanish-speaking Hispanic individuals who smoke: Development, feasibility, engagement, and clinical outcomes.Impacto——一项针对讲西班牙语的吸烟西班牙裔个体的基于数字技术的综合戒烟计划的单臂开放标签试点试验:开发、可行性、参与度和临床结果。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Mar;170:209632. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209632. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in the Rural US: A Randomized Clinical Trial.美国农村地区提高女性乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的 2 种干预措施的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e2311004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11004.
3
Reasons for Non-Attendance in the German National Mammography Screening Program: Which Barriers Can Be Overcome Using Telephone Counseling?-A Randomized Controlled Trial.德国国家乳腺X线筛查项目中未参加筛查的原因:通过电话咨询可克服哪些障碍?一项随机对照试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;11(1):17. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010017.
4
The Effect of Two Interventions to Increase Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Women.两种干预措施对提高农村妇女乳腺癌筛查率的效果
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 7;14(18):4354. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184354.
5
Factors Associated with Mammography Screening Among Women Living in Rural Areas.农村地区女性乳腺钼靶筛查的相关因素
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2022 Jun;30(2):146-153. doi: 10.54614/FNJN.2022.21039.
6
A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening.基于模型的癌症筛查参与意愿的荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052580.
7
Social inequalities in breast cancer screening: evaluating written communications with immigrant Haitian women in Montreal.社会不平等与乳腺癌筛查:评估蒙特利尔的海地移民妇女的书面沟通。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 23;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01322-0.
8
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.纸质形式的人工生成提醒:对专业实践和患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4.
9
Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among age-eligible women in Jimma town using health belief model, South West Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部 Jimma 镇适龄妇女利用健康信念模型进行宫颈癌筛查服务的利用情况及相关因素分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0826-y.
10
Promoting Breast Cancer Surveillance: The EMPOWER Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.推动乳腺癌监测:EMPOWER 研究,儿童癌症幸存者研究中的一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 20;37(24):2131-2140. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00547. Epub 2019 Jul 1.