Tan Darrell HS, Upshur Ross EG, Ford Nathan
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, R, Fraser Elliott Building 3-Suite 805, 190 Elizabeth St, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2003 Apr 1;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1472-698x-3-2.
Although a grossly disproportionate burden of disease from HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria remains in the Global South, these infectious diseases have finally risen to the top of the international agenda in recent years. Ideal strategies for combating these diseases must balance the advantages and disadvantages of 'vertical' disease control programs and 'horizontal' capacity-building approaches. DISCUSSION: The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) represents an important step forward in the struggle against these pathogens. While its goals are laudable, significant barriers persist. Most significant is the pitiful lack of funds committed by world governments, particularly those of the very G8 countries whose discussions gave rise to the Fund. A drastic scaling up of resources is the first clear requirement for the GFATM to live up to the international community's lofty intentions. A directly related issue is that of maintaining a strong commitment to the treatment of the three diseases along with traditional prevention approaches, with the ensuing debates over providing affordable access to medications in the face of the pharmaceutical industry's vigorous protection of patent rights. SUMMARY: At this early point in the Fund's history, it remains to be seen how these issues will be resolved at the programming level. Nevertheless, it is clear that significant structural changes are required in such domains as global spending priorities, debt relief, trade policy, and corporate responsibility. HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria are global problems borne of gross socioeconomic inequality, and their solutions require correspondingly geopolitical solutions.
尽管全球南方地区在艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和疟疾方面仍承担着极其不成比例的疾病负担,但近年来这些传染病终于成为国际议程的首要议题。抗击这些疾病的理想策略必须平衡“垂直”疾病控制项目和“横向”能力建设方法的利弊。
全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金(全球基金)是在与这些病原体的斗争中向前迈出的重要一步。尽管其目标值得称赞,但重大障碍依然存在。最严重的是世界各国政府,尤其是八国集团国家对该基金的资金投入少得可怜,而正是八国集团国家的讨论催生了该基金。大幅增加资源是全球基金实现国际社会崇高目标的首要明确要求。一个直接相关的问题是,在坚持传统预防方法的同时,要对这三种疾病的治疗保持坚定承诺,随之而来的是在制药行业大力保护专利权的情况下,关于提供可负担得起的药物的争论。
在该基金成立初期,这些问题在项目层面将如何解决仍有待观察。然而,很明显,在全球支出优先事项、债务减免、贸易政策和企业责任等领域需要进行重大结构变革。艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和疟疾是由严重的社会经济不平等造成的全球问题,其解决需要相应的地缘政治解决方案。