Suppr超能文献

负序重复启动效应:对未注意到的听觉序列中的顺序的抑制?

A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?

作者信息

Hughes Robert, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):199-218.

Abstract

A novel negative priming (NP) effect is reported in which serial recall for a sequence of visually presented digits was poorer if the same sequence was presented as an irrelevant auditory sequence on the previous trial (Experiments 1 and 2). The effect was enhanced when attention was divided between the to-be-repeated auditory sequence and the concurrent to-be-remembered (TBR) sequence (Experiment 3). When the TBR sequences were also presented auditorily, NP arose only when the repeated TBR sequence was in the same voice as the previous irrelevant sequence; a voice mismatch produced positive priming (Experiment 4). The results suggest that the order of auditory events is registered preattentively and that inhibition may be applied to the acoustic transitions between irrelevant events.

摘要

本文报道了一种新的负启动(NP)效应,即如果在之前的试验中相同的视觉呈现数字序列作为无关听觉序列呈现,那么对该序列的系列回忆会更差(实验1和2)。当注意力在待重复的听觉序列和同时要记住的(TBR)序列之间分配时,这种效应会增强(实验3)。当TBR序列也通过听觉呈现时,只有当重复的TBR序列与之前的无关序列声音相同时才会出现NP效应;声音不匹配则产生正启动效应(实验4)。结果表明,听觉事件的顺序在注意前就被登记,并且抑制可能应用于无关事件之间的声学转换。

相似文献

2
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):316-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.316.
3
Attention, rehearsal, and memory for serial order.
Am J Psychol. 1988 Summer;101(2):259-79.
4
5
Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1050-61. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1050.
7
Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):736-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736.
8
Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1377-88. doi: 10.1037/a0027849. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative priming in free recall reconsidered.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):686-99. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000192. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
2
Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0438-6.
3
What causes auditory distraction?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):139-44. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.139.
4
Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):352-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03193456.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验