Szibor R, Michael M, Plate I, Wittig H, Krause D
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Int J Legal Med. 2003 Jun;117(3):160-4. doi: 10.1007/s00414-002-0342-7. Epub 2003 Apr 9.
We report a case in which STR typing failed to identify the minor component of a mixed saliva stain, but a mitochondrial restriction analysis succeeded in discriminating between the two components. To identify the nt16093 and nt16265 transitions, the template was amplified with the mismatch primers L16092-mm16085 and H16266-mm16269. In the presence of the transitions the mismatch primers created a BsaB I and a Cac8 I restriction site, respectively. Subsequently, aliquots were restricted separately using the enzymes Cac8 I and BsaB I which clearly identified the minor stain component.
我们报告了一个案例,其中短串联重复序列(STR)分型未能识别混合唾液污渍中的次要成分,但线粒体限制性分析成功区分了这两种成分。为了鉴定nt16093和nt16265的转换,使用错配引物L16092-mm16085和H16266-mm16269扩增模板。在存在转换的情况下,错配引物分别产生了一个BsaB I和一个Cac8 I限制性位点。随后,分别使用Cac8 I和BsaB I酶对等分试样进行限制性消化,从而清晰地鉴定出次要污渍成分。