Miller RoseAnn, Kaneene John B, Fitzgerald Scott D, Schmitt Steven M
Population Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1314, USA.
J Wildl Dis. 2003 Jan;39(1):84-95. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-39.1.84.
A retrospective study was conducted to test the hypothesis that supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from 1995 to 1997 was associated with the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (TB) in free-ranging deer in northeastern Michigan. Bovine TB prevalence data were obtained from an ongoing surveillance program, while data relating to supplemental feeding and other risk factors were collected via in-person interviews. A multivariable Poisson regression modeling approach was used to test the stated hypothesis while controlling for other risk factors. Of the 389 potential participants, 59% agreed to participate in the study. Results showed that supplemental feeding of deer was associated with bovine TB in white-tailed deer. Specific risk factors associated with increasing risk for bovine TB were locating feed sites in areas with high levels of hardwood forests (O.R. = 1.8, 95% C.I. = 1.3-2.4), other large-scale feeding sites in the area (O.R. = 1.1, 95% C.I. = 1.0-1.2), the number of deer fed per year (O.R. = 3.9, 95% C.I. = 1.4-11.4), the numbers of feed sites spreading grain (O.R. = 14.7, 95% C.I. = 2.2-98.9), the quantity of grains provided at the site (O.R. = 1.4, 95% C.I. = 1.1-1.7), and the quantity of fruits and vegetables provided (O.R. = 1.4, 95% C.I. = 1.2-1.7). Conversely, factors associated with decreasing risk of bovine TB were locating feed sites in areas with high levels of hardwood forests (O.R. = 0.1, 95% C.I. = 0.02-0.4), locating feed sites in forests (O.R. = 0.05, 95% C.I. = 0.01-0.4), and the level of sites providing grain (O.R. = 0.1, 95% C.I. = 0.01-0.3). The results of this study suggest that banning the practice of supplemental feeding is a valid policy for control of bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging white-tailed deer.
开展了一项回顾性研究,以检验以下假设:1995年至1997年对白尾鹿(弗吉尼亚鹿)进行补充喂养与密歇根州东北部自由放养鹿群中牛结核病(TB)的患病率有关。牛结核病患病率数据来自一个正在进行的监测项目,而与补充喂养及其他风险因素相关的数据则通过面对面访谈收集。采用多变量泊松回归建模方法来检验上述假设,同时控制其他风险因素。在389名潜在参与者中,59%同意参与该研究。结果表明,对鹿进行补充喂养与白尾鹿感染牛结核病有关。与牛结核病风险增加相关的具体风险因素包括:在硬木森林覆盖率高的地区设置喂食点(比值比=1.8,95%置信区间=1.3 - 2.4)、该地区其他大规模喂食点(比值比=1.1,95%置信区间=1.0 - 1.2)、每年喂养的鹿的数量(比值比=3.9,95%置信区间=1.4 - 11.4)、散布谷物的喂食点数量(比值比=14.7,95%置信区间=2.2 - 98.9)、该地点提供的谷物数量(比值比=1.4,95%置信区间=1.1 - 1.7)以及提供的水果和蔬菜数量(比值比=1.4,95%置信区间=1.2 - 1.7)。相反,与牛结核病风险降低相关的因素包括:在硬木森林覆盖率高的地区设置喂食点(比值比=0.1,95%置信区间=0.02 - 0.4)、在森林中设置喂食点(比值比=0.05,95%置信区间=0.01 - 0.4)以及提供谷物的地点水平(比值比=0.1,95%置信区间=0.01 - 0.3)。本研究结果表明,禁止补充喂养行为是控制自由放养白尾鹿牛结核病的一项有效政策。