Steinhauser Karen E, Bosworth Hayden B, Clipp Elizabeth C, McNeilly Maya, Christakis Nicholas A, Parker Joanna, Tulsky James A
Program on the Medical Encounter and Palliative Care, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2002 Dec;5(6):829-41. doi: 10.1089/10966210260499014.
We conducted this study to pilot a new multidimensional instrument to assess the quality of life at the end of life.
Items were derived from focus groups and a national survey identifying attributes of the quality of dying. Fifty-four items measured on a five-point Likert scale covered six domains. We administered the instrument to equal numbers of Veteran's Administration (VA) and university medical center outpatients with advanced serious illness. We assessed psychometric properties using factor analysis.
Two hundred patients completed the instrument (response rate, 85%). Diagnoses included cancer (64%), congenital heart failure (CHF) (19.5%), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (10%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (6.5%). Seventy-four percent were male, 64% were caucasian, and 34% African American. Item reduction and factor analysis yielded a final instrument with 24 items in 5 distinct domains (overall Cronbach a = 0.83). The first factor (6 items; a = 0.84) measured a sense of completion, particularly through contributions to others. The second factor (7 items; alpha = 0.77) measured relations with the health care system. The third factor (6 items; alpha = 0.77) measured preparation. The fourth factor (4 items; alpha = 0.77) measured symptom severity, and the final factor (2 items; alpha = 0.60) measured affective social support.
We have developed a new instrument to measure the quality of life at the end of life that assesses empirically derived domains that are of demonstrated importance to dying patients, is acceptable to a seriously ill population, and exhibits excellent psychometric properties. Some items related to completion and preparation represent particularly new contributions to quality-of-life measurement.
我们开展本研究以试用一种新的多维工具来评估临终生活质量。
条目源自焦点小组和一项全国性调查,该调查确定了临终质量的属性。54个条目采用五点李克特量表进行测量,涵盖六个领域。我们将该工具应用于数量相等的退伍军人事务部(VA)和大学医学中心的晚期重病门诊患者。我们使用因子分析评估心理测量特性。
200名患者完成了该工具(应答率为85%)。诊断包括癌症(64%)、先天性心力衰竭(CHF)(19.5%)、终末期肾病(ESRD)(10%)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(6.5%)。74%为男性,64%为白种人,34%为非裔美国人。条目简化和因子分析产生了一个最终工具,包含5个不同领域的24个条目(总体克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.83)。第一个因子(6个条目;α系数 = 0.84)测量一种成就感,尤其是通过对他人的贡献获得的成就感。第二个因子(7个条目;α系数 = 0.77)测量与医疗保健系统的关系。第三个因子(6个条目;α系数 = 0.77)测量准备情况。第四个因子(4个条目;α系数 = 0.77)测量症状严重程度,最后一个因子(2个条目;α系数 = 0.60)测量情感社会支持。
我们开发了一种新的工具来测量临终生活质量,该工具评估了从经验中得出的、对临终患者具有重要意义的领域,重病患者群体能够接受,并且具有出色的心理测量特性。一些与成就感和准备情况相关的条目对生活质量测量做出了特别新颖的贡献。