Suppr超能文献

在小儿创伤中,螺旋CT扫描胸腔是否应取代传统胸部X光作为主要评估工具?一项疗效与成本分析。

Should helical CT scanning of the thoracic cavity replace the conventional chest x-ray as a primary assessment tool in pediatric trauma? An efficacy and cost analysis.

作者信息

Renton J, Kincaid S, Ehrlich P F

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2003 May;38(5):793-7. doi: 10.1016/jpsu.2003.50169.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Findings from studies in the trauma literature suggest that thoracic computed tomography (TCT) scanning should replace conventional radiographs as an initial imaging modality. Limited data exist on the clinical utility and cost of TCT scans in pediatric trauma. Our current practice is to obtain TCT scans in those children at risk for thoracic injures. The purpose of this study is to examine what additional information TCT provides, how frequently it results in a change in clinical management, and a cost/benefit analysis.

METHODS

Children 18 years old and younger that had both a Chest x-ray (CXR) and TCT scan in their initial workup were included. Indications for TCT scan were (1) any sign of thoracic injury on CXR, (2) pathologic findings on physical examination of the chest, and (3) high impact force to chest wall. A child may have had one or more indications for a TCT scan.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2000, 45 of 1,638 trauma patients met study criteria. Indications for TCT included thoracic injury on CXR (n = 27), findings on physical examination (n = 8) and high-impact force (n = 33). In 18 of the 45 (40%), injuries were detected with TCT imaging but not on CXR. These included contusions (n = 12), hemothorax (n = 6), pneumothorax (n = 5), widened mediastinum (n = 4), rib fractures (n = 2), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 1), and aortic injury (n = 1). In 8 patients (17.7%) TCT imaging resulted in a change in clinical management. These included insertion of a chest tube (n = 5) aortography (n = 2) and operation (n = 1). Age, sex, injury severity score, mechanism, and indication for TCT could not predict differences between TCT and CXR (P >.05). In our institution, the cost of a TCT is $200, and the patient charge is $906 ($94 per CXR). Based on our study data 200 TCTs would need to be done for each clinically significant change, increasing patient ($180,000) and hospital ($39,600) costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical TCT is a highly sensitive imaging modality for the thoracic cavity; however, routine CXR still provides clinically valuable information for the initial trauma evaluation at minimal cost. TCT should be reserved for selected cases and not as a primary imaging tool.

摘要

背景/目的:创伤文献研究结果表明,胸部计算机断层扫描(TCT)应取代传统X光片作为初始成像方式。关于TCT扫描在儿科创伤中的临床效用和成本的数据有限。我们目前的做法是对有胸部受伤风险的儿童进行TCT扫描。本研究的目的是探讨TCT能提供哪些额外信息,其导致临床管理改变的频率,以及进行成本效益分析。

方法

纳入18岁及以下在初始检查中同时进行了胸部X光(CXR)和TCT扫描的儿童。TCT扫描的指征为:(1)CXR上有任何胸部损伤迹象;(2)胸部体格检查有病理发现;(3)胸壁受到高冲击力。一名儿童可能有一项或多项TCT扫描指征。

结果

1996年至2000年期间,1638例创伤患者中有45例符合研究标准。TCT的指征包括CXR上的胸部损伤(n = 27)、体格检查发现(n = 8)和高冲击力(n = 33)。在45例中的18例(40%)中,TCT成像检测到了损伤,但CXR未检测到。这些损伤包括挫伤(n = 12)、血胸(n = 6)、气胸(n = 5)、纵隔增宽(n = 4)、肋骨骨折(n = 2)、膈肌破裂(n = 1)和主动脉损伤(n = 1)。在8例患者(17.7%)中,TCT成像导致了临床管理的改变。这些改变包括插入胸管(n = 5)、主动脉造影(n = 2)和手术(n = 1)。年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分、机制和TCT指征无法预测TCT和CXR之间的差异(P >.05)。在我们机构,一次TCT的成本为200美元,患者费用为906美元(每次CXR为94美元)。根据我们的研究数据,每出现一次具有临床意义的改变就需要进行约200次TCT扫描,这会增加患者费用(180,000美元)和医院费用(39,600美元)。

结论

螺旋TCT是一种对胸腔高度敏感的成像方式;然而,常规CXR仍然以最低成本为初始创伤评估提供有临床价值的信息。TCT应保留用于特定病例,而不是作为主要成像工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验