Dewhirst M W, Viglianti B L, Lora-Michiels M, Hanson M, Hoopes P J
Department of Radiation Oncology, Box 3455, Room 201 MSRB, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):267-94. doi: 10.1080/0265673031000119006.
This paper is one of several in this Special Issue of the International Journal of Hyperthermia that discusses the current state of knowledge about the human health risks of hyperthermia. This special issue emanated from a workshop sponsored by the World Health Organization in the Spring of 2002 on this topic. It is anticipated that these papers will help to establish guidelines for human exposure to conditions leading to hyperthermia. This comprehensive review of the literature makes it clear that much more work needs to be done to clarify what the thresholds for thermal damage are in humans. This review summarizes the basic principles that govern the relationships between thermal exposure (temperature and time of exposure) and thermal damage, with an emphasis on normal tissue effects. Methods for converting one time-temperature combination to a time at a standardized temperature are provided as well as a detailed discussion about the underlying assumptions that go into these calculations. There are few in vivo papers examining the type and extent of damage that occurs in the lower temperature range for hyperthermic exposures (e.g. 39-42 degrees C). Therefore, it is clear that estimation of thermal dose to effect at these thermal exposures is less precise in that temperature range. In addition, there are virtually no data that directly relate to the thermal sensitivity of human tissues. Thus, establishment of guidelines for human exposure based on the data provided must be done with significant caution. There is detailed review and presentation of thermal thresholds for tissue damage (based on what is detectable in vivo). The data are normalized using thermal dosimetric concepts. Tables are included in an Appendix Database which compile published data for thresholds of thermal damage in a variety of tissues and species. This database is available by request (contact MWD or PJH), but not included in this manuscript for brevity. All of the studies reported are for single acute thermal exposures. Except for brain function and physiology (as detailed in this issue by Sharma et al) one notes the critical lack of publications examining effects of chronic thermal exposures as might be encountered in occupational hazards. This review also does not include information on the embryo, which is covered in detail elsewhere in this volume (see article by Edwards et al.) as well as in a recent review on this subject, which focuses on thermal dose.
本文是《国际热疗杂志》这一特刊中的几篇论文之一,探讨了关于热疗对人类健康风险的当前知识状况。这一特刊源自世界卫生组织于2002年春季主办的关于该主题的一次研讨会。预计这些论文将有助于制定人类暴露于导致热疗条件下的指导方针。对文献的全面综述清楚地表明,要阐明人类热损伤的阈值还需要做更多工作。本综述总结了支配热暴露(温度和暴露时间)与热损伤之间关系的基本原理,重点是正常组织效应。提供了将一种时间 - 温度组合转换为标准化温度下的时间的方法,以及对这些计算所依据的基本假设的详细讨论。在热疗暴露的较低温度范围(例如39 - 42摄氏度)内,很少有体内研究考察所发生损伤的类型和程度。因此,很明显在该温度范围内,对这些热暴露下产生效应的热剂量估计不太精确。此外,几乎没有直接与人体组织热敏感性相关的数据。因此,基于所提供的数据制定人类暴露指导方针时必须极其谨慎。文中详细回顾并呈现了组织损伤的热阈值(基于体内可检测到的情况)。数据使用热剂量学概念进行了标准化。附录数据库中包含表格,汇编了各种组织和物种热损伤阈值的已发表数据。该数据库可应要求提供(联系MWD或PJH),但为简洁起见未包含在本手稿中。所报道的所有研究均针对单次急性热暴露。除了脑功能和生理学(如本期Sharma等人所详述)外,人们注意到严重缺乏关于职业危害中可能遇到的慢性热暴露影响的出版物。本综述也不包括关于胚胎的信息,该内容在本卷其他地方(见Edwards等人的文章)以及最近一篇关于该主题且侧重于热剂量的综述中有详细阐述。