• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有随机注意时间和处理顺序的多属性选择替代方案的顺序抽样模型。

Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.

Mathematics, Modeling, and Computing Center, School of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 9;8:697. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00697. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00697
PMID:25249963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4158981/
Abstract

A sequential sampling model for multiattribute binary choice options, called multiattribute attention switching (MAAS) model, assumes a separate sampling process for each attribute. During the deliberation process attention switches from one attribute consideration to the next. The order in which attributes are considered as well for how long each attribute is considered-the attention time-influences the predicted choice probabilities and choice response times. Several probability distributions for the attention time with different variances are investigated. Depending on the time and order schedule the model predicts a rich choice probability/choice response time pattern including preference reversals and fast errors. Furthermore, the difference between finite and infinite decision horizons for the attribute considered last is investigated. For the former case the model predicts a probability p 0 > 0 of not deciding within the available time. The underlying stochastic process for each attribute is an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process approximated by a discrete birth-death process. All predictions are also true for the widely applied Wiener process.

摘要

一种用于多属性二项选择选项的顺序抽样模型,称为多属性注意切换(MAAS)模型,假设每个属性都有一个单独的抽样过程。在审议过程中,注意力从一个属性的考虑切换到下一个属性的考虑。属性被考虑的顺序以及每个属性被考虑的时间——注意时间——会影响预测的选择概率和选择反应时间。研究了几种具有不同方差的注意力时间的概率分布。根据时间和顺序安排,该模型预测了一种丰富的选择概率/选择反应时间模式,包括偏好反转和快速错误。此外,还研究了最后考虑的属性的有限和无限决策范围之间的差异。在前一种情况下,模型预测在可用时间内不做出决定的概率 p0>0。每个属性的基础随机过程是一个 Ornstein-Uhlenbeck 过程,由离散的生死过程近似。所有预测对于广泛应用的 Wiener 过程也是正确的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/776e544f759d/fnhum-08-00697-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/65cb0d29e951/fnhum-08-00697-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/515c3b91b185/fnhum-08-00697-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/2fe6a00c8225/fnhum-08-00697-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/49e562bcf443/fnhum-08-00697-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/b24939f3a001/fnhum-08-00697-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/8b5f40e51e5a/fnhum-08-00697-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/4c19303356e0/fnhum-08-00697-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/d265041af9cd/fnhum-08-00697-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/cd254523240b/fnhum-08-00697-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/e315fa73d3ba/fnhum-08-00697-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/776e544f759d/fnhum-08-00697-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/65cb0d29e951/fnhum-08-00697-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/515c3b91b185/fnhum-08-00697-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/2fe6a00c8225/fnhum-08-00697-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/49e562bcf443/fnhum-08-00697-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/b24939f3a001/fnhum-08-00697-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/8b5f40e51e5a/fnhum-08-00697-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/4c19303356e0/fnhum-08-00697-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/d265041af9cd/fnhum-08-00697-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/cd254523240b/fnhum-08-00697-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/e315fa73d3ba/fnhum-08-00697-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8428/4158981/776e544f759d/fnhum-08-00697-g0011.jpg

相似文献

1
Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.具有随机注意时间和处理顺序的多属性选择替代方案的顺序抽样模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 9;8:697. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00697. eCollection 2014.
2
Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints.时间限制下决策的动态随机模型
J Math Psychol. 1997 Sep;41(3):260-74. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1997.1167.
3
Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.多属性、多选项的选择模型:选择、反应时间与过程追踪。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Nov;98:45-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.二元属性选择的注意漂移扩散模型。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
MDFT account of decision making under time pressure.时间压力下决策的多维度功能理论解释
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):157-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03196480.
6
The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice.用于N选1偏好选择的2N元选择树模型
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 20;3:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00189. eCollection 2012.
7
A Critical Role for Human Ventromedial Frontal Lobe in Value Comparison of Complex Objects Based on Attribute Configuration.人类腹内侧前额叶在基于属性配置的复杂对象价值比较中的关键作用。
J Neurosci. 2019 May 22;39(21):4124-4132. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2969-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
Preference accumulation as a process model of desirability ratings.偏好积累作为期望评分的过程模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Mar;109:47-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Naturalistic multiattribute choice.自然主义多属性选择。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:71-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.对解释感知决策任务中收益对反应偏差影响的序贯抽样模型的进一步测试。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):229-56. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.2.229.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for seeking effort or reward information bias the willingness to work.寻求努力或奖励信息的偏好会影响工作意愿。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 14;12(1):19486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21917-7.
2
Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.数量和时间对跨期选择有独立的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Apr;3(4):383-392. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
3
Some task demands induce collapsing bounds: Evidence from a behavioral analysis.某些任务需求会导致边界崩溃:来自行为分析的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.选择反应时主要建模方案的不可证伪性和互译性。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):1-32. doi: 10.1037/a0034190. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
2
Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction.实验心理学中的扩散模型:实践指南
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(6):385-402. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000218.
3
Dynamic integration of reward and stimulus information in perceptual decision-making.在感知决策中,奖励和刺激信息的动态整合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1225-1248. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1479-9.
4
Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm.基于慢反应时间范式的扩散模型的实验验证。
Psychol Res. 2019 Sep;83(6):1194-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0945-8. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
A martingale analysis of first passage times of time-dependent Wiener diffusion models.时变维纳扩散模型首次通过时间的鞅分析
J Math Psychol. 2017 Apr;77:94-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
6
Iterative free-energy optimization for recurrent neural networks (INFERNO).循环神经网络的迭代自由能优化(INFERNO)。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173684. eCollection 2017.
7
Advances in modern mental chronometry.现代心理测时法的进展
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 6;9:256. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00256. eCollection 2015.
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 3;6(3):e16749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016749.
4
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.两阶段动态信号检测:选择、决策时间和信心的理论。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):864-901. doi: 10.1037/a0019737.
5
Integration of sensory and reward information during perceptual decision-making in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the macaque monkey.在猕猴的外侧顶内沟皮层(LIP)中,感觉和奖励信息在知觉决策中的整合。
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009308.
6
Decision-making with multiple alternatives.具有多个备选方案的决策
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):693-702. doi: 10.1038/nn.2123. Epub 2008 May 18.
7
A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.对解释感知决策任务中收益对反应偏差影响的序贯抽样模型的进一步测试。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):229-56. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.2.229.
8
The neural basis of decision making.决策的神经基础。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038.
9
The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.最优决策的物理学:对二选一强制选择任务中表现模型的形式分析。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700.
10
Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: behavior and physiology.关于运动方向决策的随机模型:行为与生理学
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):981-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.05.042. Epub 2006 Sep 6.