• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过皮肤镜诊断色素沉着性皮肤病变:基于网络的培训可提高非专家的诊断能力。

Diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions by dermoscopy: web-based training improves diagnostic performance of non-experts.

作者信息

Pagnanelli G, Soyer H P, Argenziano G, Talamini R, Barbati R, Bianchi L, Campione E, Carboni I, Carrozzo A M, Chimenti M S, de Simoni I, Falcomatà V, Filipe Neto I, Francesconi F, Ginebri A, Hagman J, Marulli G C, Palamara F, Vidolin A P, Piemonte P, Soda R, Chimenti S

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, P.le dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2003 Apr;148(4):698-702. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05168.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05168.x
PMID:12752126
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermoscopy has been shown to enhance the diagnosis of melanoma. However, use of dermoscopy requires training and expertise to be effective.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether an Internet-based course is a suitable tool in teaching dermoscopy, and to evaluate the diagnostic value of pattern analysis and diagnostic algorithms in colleagues not yet familiar with this technique.

METHODS

Sixteen colleagues who were not experts in dermoscopy were asked to evaluate the dermoscopic images of 20 pigmented skin lesions using different diagnostic methods (i.e. pattern analysis, ABCD rule, seven-point checklist and Menzies' method), before and after an Internet-based training course on dermoscopy. Mean +/- SEM sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy, and kappa (kappa) intraobserver agreement were evaluated for each diagnostic method before and after training for the 16 participants. Differences between mean values were assessed by means of two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

There was a considerable improvement in the dermoscopic melanoma diagnosis after the Web-based training vs. before. Improvements in sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were significant for the ABCD rule and Menzies' method. Improvements in sensitivity were also significant for pattern analysis, whereas the sensitivity values were high for the seven-point checklist in evaluations both before and after training. No significant difference was found for specificity before and after training for any method. There was a significant improvement in the kappa intraobserver agreement after training for pattern analysis and the ABCD rule. For the seven-point checklist and Menzies' method there was already good agreement before training, with no significant improvement after training.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that Web-based training is an effective tool for teaching dermoscopy.

摘要

背景

皮肤镜已被证明可提高黑色素瘤的诊断水平。然而,使用皮肤镜需要培训和专业知识才能有效。

目的

确定基于互联网的课程是否是教授皮肤镜的合适工具,并评估模式分析和诊断算法对尚不熟悉该技术的同事的诊断价值。

方法

16名非皮肤镜专家的同事在参加基于互联网的皮肤镜培训课程前后,被要求使用不同的诊断方法(即模式分析、ABCD规则、七点检查表和门齐斯方法)评估20个色素沉着性皮肤病变的皮肤镜图像。对16名参与者在培训前后的每种诊断方法评估平均±标准误敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性,以及观察者内一致性kappa(κ)值。均值之间的差异通过双尾Wilcoxon秩和检验进行评估。

结果

与培训前相比,基于网络的培训后皮肤镜诊断黑色素瘤有显著改善。ABCD规则和门齐斯方法的敏感性和诊断准确性有显著提高。模式分析的敏感性也有显著提高,而七点检查表在培训前后评估中的敏感性值都很高。任何方法在培训前后的特异性均未发现显著差异。模式分析和ABCD规则在培训后的观察者内一致性kappa值有显著提高。对于七点检查表和门齐斯方法,培训前已经有很好的一致性,培训后没有显著改善。

结论

我们证明基于网络的培训是教授皮肤镜的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions by dermoscopy: web-based training improves diagnostic performance of non-experts.通过皮肤镜诊断色素沉着性皮肤病变:基于网络的培训可提高非专家的诊断能力。
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Apr;148(4):698-702. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05168.x.
2
Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.非专业人员使用4种皮肤镜算法诊断黑素细胞病变的比较性能。
Arch Dermatol. 2005 Aug;141(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1001/archderm.141.8.1008.
3
Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet.色素性皮肤病变的皮肤镜检查:通过互联网召开的共识会议结果
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 May;48(5):679-93. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.281.
4
Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.用于皮肤黑色素瘤诊断的数字图像分析。基于对837个黑素细胞病变的分析开发一种高效的计算机算法。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Nov;151(5):1029-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06210.x.
5
Validity and Reliability of Dermoscopic Criteria Used to Differentiate Nevi From Melanoma: A Web-Based International Dermoscopy Society Study.用于区分痣与黑色素瘤的皮肤镜标准的有效性和可靠性:一项基于网络的国际皮肤镜学会研究。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jul 1;152(7):798-806. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0624.
6
Reliability and inter-observer agreement of dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic naevi. Dermoscopy Panel.黑色素瘤和黑素细胞痣皮肤镜诊断的可靠性及观察者间一致性。皮肤镜专家组
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1998 Oct;7(5):397-402. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199810000-00005.
7
Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: a comparative study.经过培训的临床医生、接受最少皮肤镜培训的临床医生与计算机辅助诊断对341例色素性皮肤病变的皮肤镜诊断:一项比较研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2002 Sep;147(3):481-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04978.x.
8
Pattern analysis, not simplified algorithms, is the most reliable method for teaching dermoscopy for melanoma diagnosis to residents in dermatology.模式分析而非简化算法,是向皮肤科住院医师教授用于黑色素瘤诊断的皮肤镜检查的最可靠方法。
Br J Dermatol. 2003 May;148(5):981-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05023.x.
9
Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas.三种皮肤镜算法方法在诊断可疑黑素细胞性病变中的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性:浅棕色无结构区域在鉴别非典型黑素细胞痣与薄黑素瘤中的重要性。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 May;56(5):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.01.014. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
10
Dermoscopy: basic concepts.皮肤镜检查:基本概念。
Int J Dermatol. 2008 Jul;47(7):712-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03556.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of Non-Invasive Imaging Technologies for Cutaneous Melanoma.皮肤黑色素瘤的非侵入性成像技术综述
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 May 7;15(5):297. doi: 10.3390/bios15050297.
2
Digitally Enhanced Methods for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment Responses in Actinic Keratoses: A New Avenue in Personalized Skin Care.光化性角化病诊断及治疗反应监测的数字增强方法:个性化皮肤护理的新途径
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 23;16(3):484. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030484.
3
Sensitivity and Specificity for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care Providers: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Educational Interventions and Diagnostic Algorithms.
初级保健提供者皮肤癌诊断的敏感性和特异性:教育干预和诊断算法的系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1563-1572. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02194-4. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
4
Skin cancer detection using non-invasive techniques.使用非侵入性技术进行皮肤癌检测。
RSC Adv. 2018 Aug 6;8(49):28095-28130. doi: 10.1039/c8ra04164d. eCollection 2018 Aug 2.
5
Educational Interventions to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Diagnostic Skin Cancer Examinations: A Systematic Literature Review.教育干预措施以支持初级保健提供者进行皮肤癌诊断检查:系统文献回顾。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02118-8. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
6
Dermoscopy Features of Cutaneous Warts.皮肤疣的皮肤镜特征
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Dec 16;14:9903-9912. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S335276. eCollection 2021.
7
Training general practitioners in melanoma diagnosis: a scoping review of the literature.培训全科医生进行黑色素瘤诊断:文献综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e043926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043926.
8
Dermoscopy for melanoma detection and triage in primary care: a systematic review.皮肤科镜检查在初级保健中用于黑色素瘤的检测和分诊:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e027529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027529.
9
Dermoscopy use in UK primary care: a survey of GPs with a special interest in dermatology.英国初级保健中的皮肤镜检查应用:对皮肤科有特殊兴趣的全科医生的调查。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Sep;33(9):1706-1712. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15614. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.单独或联合使用视诊和皮肤镜检查诊断成人角质形成细胞皮肤癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD011901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011901.pub2.