• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明确无误?:促进健康信息馆员在实践中运用信息研究

Clear-cut?: facilitating health librarians to use information research in practice.

作者信息

Booth Andrew, Brice Anne

机构信息

Information Resources Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2003 Jun;20 Suppl 1:45-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.10.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.10.x
PMID:12757435
Abstract

In 1999, staff at the universities of Sheffield and Oxford commenced an unfunded project to examine whether it is feasible to apply critical appraisal to daily library practice. This aimed to establish whether barriers experienced when appraising medical literature (such as lack of clinical knowledge, poor knowledge of research methodology and little familiarity with statistical terms) might be reduced when appraising research within a librarian's own discipline. Innovative workshops were devised to equip health librarians with skills in interpreting and applying research. Critical Skills Training in Appraisal for Librarians (CRISTAL) used purpose-specific checklists based on the Users' Guides to the Medical Literature. Delivery was via half-day workshops, based on a format used by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Two pilot workshops in Sheffield and Oxford were evaluated using a brief post-workshop form. Participants recorded objectives in attending, their general understanding of research, and whether they had read the paper before the workshop. They were asked about the length, content and presentation of the workshop, the general format, organization and learning environment, whether it had been a good use of their time and whether they had enjoyed it. Findings must be interpreted with caution. The workshops were enjoyable and a good use of time. Although the scenario selected required no clinical knowledge, barriers remain regarding statistics and research methodology. Future workshops for librarians should include sessions on research design and statistics. Further developments will take forward these findings.

摘要

1999年,谢菲尔德大学和牛津大学的工作人员启动了一个无资金支持的项目,以研究将批判性评价应用于日常图书馆实践是否可行。其目的是确定在评价医学文献时遇到的障碍(如缺乏临床知识、对研究方法了解不足以及对统计术语不太熟悉)在评价图书馆员自身学科的研究时是否可能减少。设计了创新的研讨会,以使健康科学图书馆员具备解读和应用研究的技能。图书馆员批判性评价技能培训(CRISTAL)使用基于《医学文献用户指南》的特定目的清单。培训通过为期半天的研讨会进行,采用批判性评价技能计划使用的形式。在谢菲尔德和牛津举办的两次试点研讨会使用简短的研讨会后表格进行了评估。参与者记录了参加的目标、他们对研究的总体理解,以及他们在研讨会前是否阅读过该论文。他们被问及研讨会的时长、内容和展示方式、总体形式、组织和学习环境、是否充分利用了他们的时间以及他们是否喜欢该研讨会。研究结果必须谨慎解读。这些研讨会很有趣,时间利用得也很好。尽管所选案例不需要临床知识,但在统计和研究方法方面仍然存在障碍。未来面向图书馆员的研讨会应包括研究设计和统计方面的课程。进一步的发展将推进这些研究结果。

相似文献

1
Clear-cut?: facilitating health librarians to use information research in practice.明确无误?:促进健康信息馆员在实践中运用信息研究
Health Info Libr J. 2003 Jun;20 Suppl 1:45-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.10.x.
2
What type of leader am I?: a training needs analysis of health library and information managers.我属于哪种类型的领导者?:卫生图书馆和信息管理人员培训需求分析。
Health Info Libr J. 2012 Mar;29(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00967.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
3
Healthcare librarians and the delivery of critical appraisal training: barriers to involvement.卫生保健图书馆员与批判性评价培训的提供:参与的障碍。
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Mar;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00922.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
4
Academic mentorship: an effective professional development strategy for medical reference librarians.学术指导:医学参考馆员有效的职业发展策略
Med Ref Serv Q. 2001 Summer;20(2):23-31. doi: 10.1300/J115v20n02_03.
5
A journal club is an effective tool for assisting librarians in the practice of evidence-based librarianship: a case study.期刊俱乐部是协助图书馆员践行循证图书馆学的有效工具:一项案例研究。
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Mar;23(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00638.x.
6
Healthcare librarians and learner support: a review of competences and methods.医疗保健图书馆员与学习者支持:能力与方法综述
Health Info Libr J. 2005 Dec;22 Suppl 2:42-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-3327.2005.00612.x.
7
Increasingly the health information professional's role in supporting evidence-based practice requires familiarity with critical appraisal skills, resources and techniques.健康信息专业人员在支持循证实践方面的作用日益要求其熟悉批判性评价技能、资源和技术。
Health Info Libr J. 2001 Sep;18(3):175-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2001.00340.x.
8
Evidence based library and information practice in Australia: defining skills and knowledge.澳大利亚循证图书馆和信息实践:定义技能和知识。
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Jun;28(2):152-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00937.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
9
Facilitating research amongst radiographers through information literacy workshops.通过信息素养工作坊促进放射技师的研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):112-119. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.842.
10
Health librarians: developing professional competence through a 'legitimate peripheral participation' model.卫生图书馆员:通过“合法的边缘参与”模式发展专业能力。
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Dec;28(4):326-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00959.x. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Building capacity among health care librarians to teach evidence-based practice-an evaluation.提升卫生保健图书馆员教授循证实践的能力——评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):432-440. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1126.
2
Using staffing ratios for workforce planning: evidence on nine allied health professions.利用人员配备比率进行劳动力规划:九个相关医疗保健专业的证据。
Hum Resour Health. 2012 Feb 1;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-10-2.
3
Developing methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: an example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 2. Evaluation of the literature--a practical guide.
制定卫生服务提供与组织领域的系统评价方法:以学习障碍者获得医疗保健的评价为例。第2部分。文献评价——实用指南。
Health Info Libr J. 2004 Dec;21(4):227-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2004.00543.x.