Booth Andrew, Brice Anne
Information Resources Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Health Info Libr J. 2003 Jun;20 Suppl 1:45-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.10.x.
In 1999, staff at the universities of Sheffield and Oxford commenced an unfunded project to examine whether it is feasible to apply critical appraisal to daily library practice. This aimed to establish whether barriers experienced when appraising medical literature (such as lack of clinical knowledge, poor knowledge of research methodology and little familiarity with statistical terms) might be reduced when appraising research within a librarian's own discipline. Innovative workshops were devised to equip health librarians with skills in interpreting and applying research. Critical Skills Training in Appraisal for Librarians (CRISTAL) used purpose-specific checklists based on the Users' Guides to the Medical Literature. Delivery was via half-day workshops, based on a format used by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Two pilot workshops in Sheffield and Oxford were evaluated using a brief post-workshop form. Participants recorded objectives in attending, their general understanding of research, and whether they had read the paper before the workshop. They were asked about the length, content and presentation of the workshop, the general format, organization and learning environment, whether it had been a good use of their time and whether they had enjoyed it. Findings must be interpreted with caution. The workshops were enjoyable and a good use of time. Although the scenario selected required no clinical knowledge, barriers remain regarding statistics and research methodology. Future workshops for librarians should include sessions on research design and statistics. Further developments will take forward these findings.
1999年,谢菲尔德大学和牛津大学的工作人员启动了一个无资金支持的项目,以研究将批判性评价应用于日常图书馆实践是否可行。其目的是确定在评价医学文献时遇到的障碍(如缺乏临床知识、对研究方法了解不足以及对统计术语不太熟悉)在评价图书馆员自身学科的研究时是否可能减少。设计了创新的研讨会,以使健康科学图书馆员具备解读和应用研究的技能。图书馆员批判性评价技能培训(CRISTAL)使用基于《医学文献用户指南》的特定目的清单。培训通过为期半天的研讨会进行,采用批判性评价技能计划使用的形式。在谢菲尔德和牛津举办的两次试点研讨会使用简短的研讨会后表格进行了评估。参与者记录了参加的目标、他们对研究的总体理解,以及他们在研讨会前是否阅读过该论文。他们被问及研讨会的时长、内容和展示方式、总体形式、组织和学习环境、是否充分利用了他们的时间以及他们是否喜欢该研讨会。研究结果必须谨慎解读。这些研讨会很有趣,时间利用得也很好。尽管所选案例不需要临床知识,但在统计和研究方法方面仍然存在障碍。未来面向图书馆员的研讨会应包括研究设计和统计方面的课程。进一步的发展将推进这些研究结果。