Jung Alan P
Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0312, USA.
Sports Med. 2003;33(7):539-52. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00005.
Traditionally, distance running performance was thought to be determined by several characteristics, including maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)), lactate threshold (LT), and running economy. Improvements in these areas are primarily achieved through endurance training. Recently, however, it has been shown that anaerobic factors may also play an important role in distance running performance. As a result, some researchers have theorised that resistance training may benefit distance runners. Because resistance training is unlikely to elicit an aerobic stimulus of greater than 50% of VO(2max), it is unlikely that resistance training would improve VO(2max) in trained distance runners. However, it appears that VO(2max) is not compromised when resistance training is added to an endurance programme. Similarly, LT is likely not improved as a result of resistance training in trained endurance runners; however, improvements in LT have been observed in untrained individuals as a result of resistance training. Trained distance runners have shown improvements of up to 8% in running economy following a period of resistance training. Even a small improvement in running economy could have a large impact on distance running performance, particularly in longer events, such as marathons or ultra-marathons. The improvement in running economy has been theorised to be a result of improvements in neuromuscular characteristics, including motor unit recruitment and reduced ground contact time. Although largely theoretical at this point, if resistance training is to improve distance running performance, it will likely have the largest impact on anaerobic capacity and/or neuromuscular characteristics. The primary purpose of this review is to consider the impact of resistance training on the factors that are known to impact distance running performance. A second purpose is to consider different modes of resistance exercise to determine if an optimal protocol exists.
传统上,长跑成绩被认为取决于几个因素,包括最大摄氧量(VO₂max)、乳酸阈值(LT)和跑步经济性。这些方面的改善主要通过耐力训练来实现。然而,最近有研究表明,无氧因素在长跑成绩中也可能起重要作用。因此,一些研究人员推测阻力训练可能对长跑运动员有益。由于阻力训练不太可能引发大于VO₂max 50%的有氧刺激,因此阻力训练不太可能提高训练有素的长跑运动员的VO₂max。然而,当在耐力训练计划中加入阻力训练时,VO₂max似乎并未受到影响。同样,训练有素的耐力跑运动员进行阻力训练后,LT可能不会提高;然而,未经训练的个体进行阻力训练后,LT有改善。经过一段时间的阻力训练后,训练有素的长跑运动员的跑步经济性提高了8%。即使跑步经济性有小幅提高,也可能对长跑成绩产生重大影响,尤其是在马拉松或超级马拉松等较长距离的赛事中。跑步经济性的提高被推测是神经肌肉特征改善的结果,包括运动单位募集和地面接触时间减少。虽然目前这在很大程度上是理论上的,但如果阻力训练要提高长跑成绩,它可能对无氧能力和/或神经肌肉特征产生最大影响。本综述的主要目的是考虑阻力训练对已知影响长跑成绩的因素的影响。第二个目的是考虑不同的阻力运动模式,以确定是否存在最佳方案。