Suppr超能文献

高血糖重症患者中高蛋白疾病特异性肠内营养制剂与高蛋白肠内营养制剂的比较。

Comparison of a high-protein disease-specific enteral formula with a high-protein enteral formula in hyperglycemic critically ill patients.

作者信息

Mesejo A, Acosta J A, Ortega C, Vila J, Fernández M, Ferreres J, Sanchis J C, López F

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):295-305. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00234-0.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine whether a specific high-protein enteral formula with a similar caloric percentage of fat and carbohydrates achieves greater control over glycemic levels and reduces insulin requirements in hyperglycemic critically ill patients when compared to a control high-protein enteral formula.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial in two University Hospital Intensive Care Units in Spain.

METHODS

We enrolled 50 patients with diabetes mellitus or stress hyperglycemia with basal glycemia > or =160 mg/dl and indication for enteral nutrition > or =5 days. Patients with severe kidney failure, liver failure or obesity were excluded from the study. In the first 48 h of admission, after randomization, 26 patients received the study diet and 24 patients received the control diet. The variables were monitored for 14 days. The Harris-Benedict formula with a fixed stress factor of 1.2 was used to calculate caloric needs. Insulin was administered by continuous infusion. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

On admission, there were no differences between the study and control group in plasma glucose levels (mg/dl) (190.9+/-45 vs 210.3+/-63) and capillary glucose levels (mg/dl) (226.1+/-73 vs 213.8+/-67). After the feeding trial, there were differences between the study and control group in plasma glucose levels (mg/dl) (176.8+/-44 vs 222.8+/-47, P=0.001), capillary glucose levels (mg/dl) (163.1+/-45 vs 216.4+/-56, P=0.001), insulin requirements/day (IU) 8.73 (2.3-27.5) vs 30.2 (21.5-57.1) (P=0.001), insulin/received carbohydrates (UI/g) 0.07 (0.02-0.22) vs 0.18 (0.11-0.35) (P=0.02) and insulin/received carbohydrates/kg 0.98 (0.26-3.59) vs 2.13 (1.44-4.58) (P=0.04). These differences remain in a day-to-day comparison. There were no differences in the analytical tests, or in digestive or infectious complications. Intensive Care Unit length of stay, mechanical ventilation and mortality were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycemic critically ill patients fed with a high-protein diet with a similar caloric percentage of fat and carbohydrates show a significant reduction in plasma glucose levels, capillary glucose levels and insulin requirements in comparison to patients on a conventional high-protein diet. This better glycemic control do not modify Intensive Care Unit length of stay, infectious complications, mechanical ventilation and mortality.

摘要

目的

确定与对照高蛋白肠内营养配方相比,一种脂肪和碳水化合物热量百分比相似的特定高蛋白肠内营养配方,对高血糖重症患者的血糖水平控制是否更佳以及胰岛素需求量是否更低。

设计

在西班牙两家大学医院重症监护病房进行的一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲试验。

方法

我们纳入了50例患有糖尿病或应激性高血糖且基础血糖≥160mg/dl、有肠内营养指征且预计≥5天的患者。排除患有严重肾衰竭、肝功能衰竭或肥胖症的患者。入院后的前48小时,随机分组后,26例患者接受研究饮食,24例患者接受对照饮食。对变量进行14天的监测。使用固定应激系数为1.2的哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式计算热量需求。胰岛素通过持续输注给药。进行意向性分析。

结果

入院时,研究组和对照组的血浆葡萄糖水平(mg/dl)(190.9±45对210.3±63)和毛细血管葡萄糖水平(mg/dl)(226.1±73对213.8±67)无差异。喂养试验后,研究组和对照组在血浆葡萄糖水平(mg/dl)(176.8±44对222.8±47,P=0.001)、毛细血管葡萄糖水平(mg/dl)(163.1±45对216.4±56,P=0.001)、每日胰岛素需求量(IU)8.73(2.3 - 27.5)对30.2(21.5 - 57.1)(P=0.001)、胰岛素/摄入碳水化合物(UI/g)0.07(0.02 - 0.22)对0.18(0.11 - 0.35)(P=0.02)以及胰岛素/摄入碳水化合物/千克0.98(0.26 - 3.59)对2.13(1.44 - 4.58)(P=0.04)方面存在差异。这些差异在每日比较中仍然存在。在分析测试、消化或感染并发症方面无差异。两组的重症监护病房住院时间、机械通气情况和死亡率相似。

结论

与接受传统高蛋白饮食的患者相比,食用脂肪和碳水化合物热量百分比相似的高蛋白饮食的高血糖重症患者,其血浆葡萄糖水平、毛细血管葡萄糖水平和胰岛素需求量显著降低。这种更好的血糖控制并未改变重症监护病房住院时间、感染并发症、机械通气情况和死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验