Saloviita T, Itälinna M, Leinonen E
Department of Special Education, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003 May-Jun;47(Pt 4-5):300-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00492.x.
Twenty variables based on the Double ABCX Model of adaptation and selected on the basis of previous research were chosen to explain the parental stress of the mothers (n = 116) and fathers (n = 120) of children with an intellectual disability (age range = 1- 10 years).
Principal component analysis, rotated into varimax-criterion, was done separately for mothers and fathers. The solution containing eight factors was considered best for both groups. They accounted for more than 70% of the total variance of the original variables. These eight orthogonal components were then entered into a stepwise regression analysis that was done separately for mothers and fathers.
The multiple regression equations obtained explained 72% of the variance in maternal stress and 78% of the variance in paternal stress. The equations for mothers and fathers contained six and seven components, respectively.
The variables used in the present study were highly successful in accounting for parental stress. The results confirm the importance of intervening factors in explaining the stress. The single most important predictor of parental stress was the negative definition of the situation. In mothers, the negative definition was associated with the behavioural problems of the child while, in fathers it was connected with the experienced social acceptance of the child.
基于适应的双ABCX模型并根据先前研究选择了20个变量,以解释智力残疾儿童(年龄范围=1至10岁)的母亲(n = 116)和父亲(n = 120)的父母压力。
对母亲和父亲分别进行主成分分析,并旋转至方差最大化标准。包含八个因素的解决方案被认为对两组都是最佳的。它们占原始变量总方差的70%以上。然后将这八个正交成分分别纳入母亲和父亲的逐步回归分析。
得到的多元回归方程分别解释了母亲压力方差的72%和父亲压力方差的78%。母亲和父亲的方程分别包含六个和七个成分。
本研究中使用的变量在解释父母压力方面非常成功。结果证实了干预因素在解释压力方面的重要性。父母压力的唯一最重要预测因素是对情况的负面定义。在母亲中,负面定义与孩子的行为问题有关,而在父亲中,它与孩子所体验到的社会接纳有关。