Kumar Vikrant, Reddy B Mohan
Anthropology and Human Genetics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata 700 108, India.
J Biosci. 2003 Jun;28(4):507-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02705125.
Among the most contentious currently debated issues is about the people who had settled first in the Indian subcontinent. It has been suggested that the communities affiliated to the Austro-Asiatic linguistic family are perhaps the first to settle in India and the palaeoanthropological evidences suggest the earliest settlement probably around 60,000 years BP. Recent speculations, based on both traditional genetic markers and DNA markers, seem to corroborate the aforesaid view. However, these studies are inadequate both in terms of the representation of the constituent groups within this broad linguistic category as well as the number of samples that represent each of them. We strongly feel that, before making any formidable conclusions on the peopling of India and/or the history of settlement, it is necessary to ascertain that the Austro-Asiatic speakers, represented by over 30 different tribal groups, either genetically constitute a homogenous single entity or are a heterogeneous conglomeration, derived from different sources. As a first step towards this we tried to collate and analyse the existing information geographic, ethno-historic, cultural and biological. The results of the analyses of anthropometric and genetic marker data indicate that the Austro-Asiatic groups, particularly the Mundari speakers, with certain exceptions, show greater homogeneity among them when compared to the other linguistic groups, although certain groups show as outliers. However, traditional genetic markers show lower within population heterozygosity compared to Dravidian and other Indian populations. This is contrary to what has been claimed in case of certain DNA markers. Given that relatively greater heterozygosity among the Austro-Asiatic populations has been taken as one of the important evidences supporting greater antiquity of these populations one should await results of detailed DNA studies being currently undertaken by us, involving a number of Austro-Asiatic and other ethnic populations of India to resolve the issue unequivocally.
当前最具争议的问题之一是关于最早在印度次大陆定居的人群。有人认为,隶属于南亚语系的群体可能是最早在印度定居的,古人类学证据表明最早的定居可能在距今约6万年以前。最近基于传统基因标记和DNA标记的推测似乎证实了上述观点。然而,这些研究在这个广泛语言类别中各组成群体的代表性以及代表每个群体的样本数量方面都存在不足。我们强烈认为,在对印度的人口构成和/或定居历史得出任何确凿结论之前,有必要确定以30多个不同部落群体为代表的南亚语系使用者在基因上是构成一个同质的单一实体,还是一个源自不同来源的异质集合。作为迈向这一目标的第一步,我们试图整理和分析现有的地理、民族历史、文化和生物学信息。人体测量和基因标记数据分析结果表明,南亚语系群体,特别是讲蒙达里语的群体,除了某些例外情况,与其他语言群体相比,内部显示出更大的同质性,尽管某些群体表现为异常值。然而,与达罗毗荼语系和其他印度人群体相比,传统基因标记显示群体内部杂合度较低。这与某些DNA标记的情况所声称的相反。鉴于南亚语系人群中相对较高的杂合度被视为支持这些人群具有更古老历史的重要证据之一,我们应该等待我们目前正在进行的详细DNA研究结果,该研究涉及印度的一些南亚语系和其他民族群体,以明确解决这个问题。