Suppr超能文献

次氯酸钠与葡萄糖酸氯己定加溴化十六烷基三甲铵对根管厌氧细菌菌群杀菌效果的体外比较研究

[A comparative in-vitro study of the bactericidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate plus cetrimide on root canal anaerobic bacterial flora].

作者信息

D'Arcangelo C, Varvara G

机构信息

Istituto di Discipline Odontostomatologiche, Università degli Studi G. D'Annunzio, Chieti.

出版信息

Minerva Stomatol. 1998 Sep;47(9):381-6.

PMID:9835745
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The permanence of necrotic tissues and/or bacteria may be responsible for persistent root canal infection. Root canal irrigation plays an important role in the success of endodontic treatment given that, on the one hand, it encourages the progressive elimination of the smear layer and, on the other, it neutralises microbic flora within the canal. The aim of this study was to test root canal irrigants from a microbiological point of view: sodium hypochlorite 5% (Niclor Ogna, Milan) and a new generation irrigant based on chlorhexidine gluconate and cetrimide (Cetrexidine VEBAS S. Giuliano Milanese-MI).

METHODS

The experiments were performed on a series of obligatory anaerobic bacteria which are most frequently found in the endodontium, all belonging to the international collection "American Type Culture Collection" (ATCC) and supplied by Dasit SpA, Cornaredo (MI). The following bacterial strains were used in the experiment: Actinimyces odontolyticus ATCC 17929, Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586, Prevotella melanginogenica ATCC 25845, Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277. The working concentration (CFU/ml) was defined as 0.5 McFarland which corresponds to a concentration of microorganisms equivalent to approx. 1.5 x 10(3) bacteria. Each irrigant was kept in contact with the bacterial species used for this experiment for 10', 20', 30'.

RESULTS

The results obtained confirm the bactericidal efficacy of both irrigants used, even after a short contact time.

CONCLUSIONS

This does not mean that all irrigants are the same and/or promise the same results. This was a microbiological study, but in practice it is important to bear in mind other variables, such as contact time. Moreover, in order to increase the probability of endodontic treatment, root canal irrigants are also required to satisfy other criteria: biocompatibility, scarce toxicity, high proteolytic power.

摘要

引言

坏死组织和/或细菌的持续存在可能是根管持续感染的原因。根管冲洗在牙髓治疗成功中起着重要作用,因为一方面它有助于逐步清除玷污层,另一方面它能中和根管内的微生物菌群。本研究的目的是从微生物学角度测试根管冲洗剂:5%次氯酸钠(Niclor Ogna,米兰)和一种基于葡萄糖酸洗必泰和西曲溴铵的新一代冲洗剂(Cetrexidine VEBAS,圣朱利亚诺-米兰ese-MI)。

方法

实验针对一系列牙髓中最常见的专性厌氧菌进行,这些细菌均来自国际菌种保藏中心“美国典型培养物保藏中心”(ATCC),由位于科纳雷多(米兰)的Dasit SpA公司提供。实验使用了以下细菌菌株:溶牙放线菌ATCC 17929、具核梭杆菌ATCC 25586、变黑普雷沃菌ATCC 25845、牙龈卟啉单胞菌ATCC 33277。工作浓度(CFU/ml)定义为0.5麦氏浊度,相当于约1.5×10³个细菌的微生物浓度。每种冲洗剂与本实验所用细菌种类接触10分钟、20分钟、30分钟。

结果

所获结果证实了两种所用冲洗剂的杀菌效果,即使接触时间较短。

结论

这并不意味着所有冲洗剂都相同和/或能保证相同结果。这是一项微生物学研究,但在实际操作中,重要的是要记住其他变量,如接触时间。此外,为了提高牙髓治疗的成功率,根管冲洗剂还需满足其他标准:生物相容性、低毒性、高蛋白水解能力。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验