Demakis George J
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 28223-0001, USA.
Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):255-64. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.255.
The author conducted 2 meta-analyses on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The 1st compared participants with frontal lobe damage to those with posterior brain damage, whereas the 2nd compared participants with left and right frontal damage. Effect sizes based on the difference between groups were calculated for WCST variables and a composite measure. Effect sizes for these variables, except nonperseverative errors, indicated significantly poorer performance for participants with frontal damage. There were no significant differences for the left versus right comparisons. Moderator analyses using the composite measure for the frontal versus nonfrontal analyses indicated that the largest effect size was for dorsolateral damage. Though this study indicates that the WCST is sensitive to frontal lobe damage, caveats are discussed.
作者对威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)进行了两项荟萃分析。第一项将额叶损伤的参与者与后脑损伤的参与者进行比较,而第二项将左侧和右侧额叶损伤的参与者进行比较。针对WCST变量和一项综合指标,计算了基于组间差异的效应量。除了非持续性错误外,这些变量的效应量表明额叶损伤的参与者表现明显较差。左右比较没有显著差异。使用综合指标对额叶与非额叶分析进行的调节分析表明,最大的效应量出现在背外侧损伤。尽管这项研究表明WCST对额叶损伤敏感,但也讨论了一些注意事项。