Aliyu Zakari Y, Aliyu Muktar H, McCormick Ken
Department of Medicine, St Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2003 Jun 17;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-3-11.
A variable decision in managing community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the initial site of care; in-patient versus outpatient. These variations persist despite comprehensive practice guidelines. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) score lower than seventy have low risk for complications and outpatient antibiotic management is recommended in this group. These patients are generally below the age of fifty years, non-nursing home residents, HIV negative and have no major cardiac, hepatic, renal or malignant diseases.
A retrospective analysis of 296 low-risk CAP patients evaluated within a year one period at St. Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland was undertaken. All patients were assigned a PSI score. 208 (70%) were evaluated and discharged from the emergency department (E.D.) to complete outpatient antibiotic therapy, while 88 (30%) were hospitalized. Patients were sub-stratified into classes I-V according to PSI. A comparison of demographic, clinical, social and financial parameters was made between the E.D. discharged and hospitalized groups.
Statistically significant differences in favor of the hospitalized group were noted for female gender (CI: 1.46-5.89, p= 0.0018), African Americans (CI: 0.31-0.73, p= 0.004), insurance coverage (CI: 0.19-0.63, p= 0.0034), temperature (CI: 0.04-0.09, p= 0.0001) and pulse rate (CI: 0.03-0.14, p= 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for altered mental status, hypotension, tachypnea, laboratory/radiological parameters and social indicators (p>0.05). The average length of stay for in-patients was 3.5 days at about eight time's higher cost than outpatient management. There was no difference in mortality or treatment failures between the two groups. The documentation rate and justifications for hospitalizing low risk CAP patients by admitting physicians was less than optimal.
High fever, tachycardia, female gender, African- American race and medical insurance coverage are determinants for hospitalization among low risk CAP patients in our study. The average length of stay for in-patients was 3.5 days (3 to 5 days). The cost of in-patient care was about eight times higher than outpatient management. This study supports the recommendation of using the PSI for E.D evaluation of patients in appropriate social settings.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)管理中的一个可变决策是初始治疗地点,即住院治疗还是门诊治疗。尽管有全面的实践指南,但这些差异仍然存在。肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)得分低于70分的患者并发症风险较低,该组患者建议进行门诊抗生素治疗。这些患者通常年龄在50岁以下,不住在养老院,HIV阴性,且没有重大心脏、肝脏、肾脏或恶性疾病。
对马里兰州巴尔的摩圣艾格尼丝医院一年内评估的296例低风险CAP患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者都被分配了PSI得分。208例(70%)在急诊科(E.D.)接受评估并出院,以完成门诊抗生素治疗,而88例(30%)住院治疗。根据PSI将患者分为I-V类。对急诊科出院组和住院组的人口统计学、临床、社会和财务参数进行了比较。
在女性(CI:1.46-5.89,p = 0.0018)、非裔美国人(CI:0.31-0.73,p = 0.004)、保险覆盖情况(CI:0.19-0.63,p = 0.0034)、体温(CI:0.04-0.09,p = 0.0001)和脉搏率(CI:0.03-0.14,p = 0.0001)方面,住院组有统计学上显著的优势。两组在精神状态改变、低血压、呼吸急促、实验室/放射学参数和社会指标方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。住院患者的平均住院时间为3.5天,费用比门诊治疗高约8倍。两组在死亡率或治疗失败方面没有差异。收治医生对低风险CAP患者住院的记录率和理由并不理想。
在我们的研究中,高热、心动过速、女性、非裔美国人种族和医疗保险覆盖情况是低风险CAP患者住院的决定因素。住院患者的平均住院时间为3.5天(3至5天)。住院治疗费用比门诊治疗高约8倍。本研究支持在适当的社会环境中使用PSI对急诊科患者进行评估的建议。