• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读中的低层次预测推理:转移概率对眼动的影响。

Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements.

作者信息

McDonald Scott A, Shillcock Richard C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2003 Jul;43(16):1735-51. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00237-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00237-2
PMID:12818344
Abstract

We report the results of an investigation into the ability of transitional probability (word-to-word contingency statistics) to account for reading behaviour. Using a corpus of eye movements recorded during the reading of newspaper text, we demonstrate both the forward [P(n/n-1)] and backward [P(n/n+1)] transitional probability measures to be predictive of first fixation and gaze durations: the higher the transitional probability, the shorter the fixation time. Initial fixation position was also affected by the forward measure; we observed a small rightward shift for words that were highly predictable from the preceding word. Although transitional probability is sensitive to word class, with function words being generally more predictable from their context than content words, the measures accounted equally well for the data for both classes.

摘要

我们报告了一项关于转移概率(词与词的相依统计)解释阅读行为能力的调查结果。通过使用在阅读报纸文本过程中记录的眼动语料库,我们证明了前向转移概率[P(n/n - 1)]和后向转移概率[P(n/n + 1)]测量值均可预测首次注视时长和凝视时长:转移概率越高,注视时间越短。初始注视位置也受到前向测量值的影响;我们观察到,对于从前一个单词高度可预测的单词,会有一个小的向右偏移。尽管转移概率对词类敏感,功能词通常比实词在语境中更具可预测性,但这两种测量值对两类词的数据解释效果同样良好。

相似文献

1
Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements.阅读中的低层次预测推理:转移概率对眼动的影响。
Vision Res. 2003 Jul;43(16):1735-51. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00237-2.
2
Context length and reading novel words: an eye-movement investigation.语境长度与阅读生僻词:一项眼动研究。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Aug;104(3):347-63. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02127.x. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
3
Inferences about predictable events: eye movements during reading.关于可预测事件的推断:阅读过程中的眼动
Psychol Res. 2001;65(3):158-69. doi: 10.1007/s004260000050.
4
An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.超越单词层面的对阅读中眼动的影响:来自英语和法语阅读的证据。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(22):3786-801. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
5
On-line contextual influences during reading normal text: a multiple-regression analysis.阅读正常文本时的在线语境影响:多元回归分析
Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2172-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
6
Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance.用于算术和阅读表现的眼动模型。
Rev Oculomot Res. 1990;4:455-77.
7
Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.阅读孤立单词和连续文本时的最佳着陆位置。
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jun;47(6):583-600. doi: 10.3758/bf03203111.
8
Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults.儿童和成人阅读过程中的单词长度和落点位置效应
Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(16):2078-86. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.015. Epub 2009 May 28.
9
The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.词类(实词/虚词)区分与阅读中的眼球运动。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Jun;50(6):967-984. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001301. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Word length effects on novel words: evidence from eye movements.词长对新单词的影响:来自眼动的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):179-89. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0556-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Input Frequency and L2 Proficiency on the Representation of Collocations for Chinese EFL Learners.输入频率和二语水平对中国英语学习者搭配表征的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 4;15(1):46. doi: 10.3390/bs15010046.
2
Prediction in reading: A review of predictability effects, their theoretical implications, and beyond.阅读中的预测:可预测性效应、其理论意义及其他方面的综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):973-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02588-z. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Chinese EFL learners' processing of English binomials: the role of interlexical and intralexical factors.
中国英语学习者对英语成对词的处理:词间和词内因素的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1425856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425856. eCollection 2024.
4
Does the Processing Advantage of Formulaic Language Persist in Its Nonadjacent Forms? Evidence from Eye Movements of Chinese Collocations.公式语言的加工优势是否在其非相邻形式中持续存在?来自汉语搭配的眼动证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Mar 12;53(2):28. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10040-5.
5
Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 English sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data.205 个与现有 EEG 和阅读时间数据对齐的英语句子的 cloze 概率、可预测性评分和计算估计值。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):5190-5213. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02261-8. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
As easy as cake or a piece of pie? Processing idiom variation and the contribution of individual cognitive differences.像蛋糕或馅饼一样简单?加工习语变体和个体认知差异的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):334-351. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01463-x. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Is there a processing advantage for verb-noun collocations in Chinese reading? Evidence from eye movements during reading.中文阅读中动名词搭配是否具有加工优势?来自阅读过程中眼动的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1235735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235735. eCollection 2023.
8
The Plausibility of Sampling as an Algorithmic Theory of Sentence Processing.抽样作为句子处理算法理论的合理性。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jul 21;7:350-391. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00086. eCollection 2023.
9
The graded predictive pre-activation in Chinese sentence reading: evidence from eye movements.中文句子阅读中的分级预测性预激活:来自眼动的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1136488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136488. eCollection 2023.
10
Individual Differences in Holistic and Compositional Language Processing.整体与组合式语言处理中的个体差异。
J Cogn. 2023 Jun 28;6(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.283. eCollection 2023.