Suppr超能文献

口服2克替硝唑与酸性缓冲阴道凝胶联合使用与单独使用阴道克林霉素治疗细菌性阴道病的疗效比较:一项随机、研究者设盲的对照试验。

Efficacy of the combination of 2 g oral tinidazole and acidic buffering vaginal gel in comparison with vaginal clindamycin alone in bacterial vaginosis: a randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled trial.

作者信息

Milani Massimo, Barcellona Eliana, Agnello Antonella

机构信息

R&D Mipharm, Via B. Quaranta 12, 20141 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jul 1;109(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00478-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of tinidazole (T) (Trimonase, Mipharm, Italy) and an acidic vaginal gel (Miphil) (M) in comparison with vaginal clindamycin (CL) (Cleocin Pharmacia Upjohn) in BV.

DESIGN

A multicentre, randomised, investigator-blinded, controlled trial.

POPULATION AND METHODS

64 women with BV were enrolled. Thirty-two were allocated to receive oral T 2g, single dose, and 32 were assigned to CL 2% for 7 consecutive days. After week 1, T group were treated with an acidic vaginal gel, 2g every 3 days, for additional 3 weeks, whereas CL group did not received any additional treatment. Patients were evaluated at week 1 and 4. Vaginal pH, the BV-blue test (Gryphus Diagnostics, USA) and the whiff test were performed at baseline and at week 4.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Clinical cure rate; normalisation of vaginal pH (pH<4.5); and laboratory cure rate (defined as a clinical cure rate and a negative results of BV-blue and whiff test).

RESULTS

At baseline, vaginal pH values were (mean+/-S.D.) 5.4+/-0.7 and 5.3+/-0.5 in T and CL groups, respectively. Six patients (2 in T group and 4 in CL group) withdrew from the study due to side effects. At week 1, the clinical cure rates were 84% in both T and CL treated group (P=N.S.). At week 4, clinical cure rates were 94% in T+M group and 77% in CL group (P=N.S.). The laboratory cure rates were 81% in T+M group and 59% in CL group (P<0.04). Vaginal pH normalisation (i.e. pH <4.5) was achieved in 78% and in 38% of T+M and CL groups, respectively (P<0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, 2g single oral dose tinidazole was at least as effective as 7-day of vaginal clindamycin. The sequential treatment of tinidazole and acidic vaginal gel was superior to vaginal clindamycin in lowering vaginal pH and achieving a higher laboratory tests normalization rate at 1-month follow-up.

摘要

目的

评估替硝唑(T)(Trimonase,意大利米法姆制药公司)和酸性阴道凝胶(Miphil)(M)与阴道用克林霉素(CL)(Cleocin Pharmacia Upjohn)治疗细菌性阴道病(BV)的疗效。

设计

一项多中心、随机、研究者盲法、对照试验。

研究对象与方法

招募64例BV患者。32例分配接受单次口服2g替硝唑,32例分配接受连续7天使用2%克林霉素。第1周后,替硝唑组每3天使用2g酸性阴道凝胶再治疗3周,而克林霉素组未接受任何额外治疗。在第1周和第4周对患者进行评估。在基线和第4周进行阴道pH值、BV-蓝试验(美国Gryphus诊断公司)和嗅试验。

主要观察指标

临床治愈率;阴道pH值正常化(pH<4.5);实验室治愈率(定义为临床治愈率以及BV-蓝试验和嗅试验结果阴性)。

结果

基线时,替硝唑组和克林霉素组的阴道pH值分别为(均值±标准差)5.4±0.7和5.3±0.5。6例患者(替硝唑组2例,克林霉素组4例)因副作用退出研究。第1周时,替硝唑治疗组和克林霉素治疗组的临床治愈率均为84%(P=无显著性差异)。第4周时,替硝唑+酸性阴道凝胶组的临床治愈率为94%,克林霉素组为77%(P=无显著性差异)。替硝唑+酸性阴道凝胶组的实验室治愈率为81%,克林霉素组为59%(P<0.04)。替硝唑+酸性阴道凝胶组和克林霉素组分别有78%和38%的患者实现阴道pH值正常化(即pH<4.5)(P<0.0007)。

结论

短期内,单次口服2g替硝唑至少与7天阴道用克林霉素效果相当。在1个月随访时,替硝唑与酸性阴道凝胶序贯治疗在降低阴道pH值和实现更高的实验室检查正常化率方面优于阴道用克林霉素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验