• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性开角型青光眼、正常眼压性青光眼和高眼压症患者视盘地形图参数的比较。

A comparison of optic disc topographic parameters in patients with primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension.

作者信息

Kiriyama Naoko, Ando Akira, Fukui Chieko, Nambu Hiroyuki, Nishikawa Maki, Terauchi Hiroo, Kuwahara Atsuko, Matsumura Miyo

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizono, Moriguchi, 570-8507, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;241(7):541-545. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0702-0. Epub 2003 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-003-0702-0
PMID:12819980
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) findings have been employed to quantitatively assess the topography of optic discs. We measured topographic parameters of optic discs in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), and ocular hypertension (OH) using an HRT in order to determine whether HRT topographic parameters can be used to differentiate those conditions.

METHODS

Seventeen eyes in 17 patients with POAG, 23 eyes in 23 patients with NTG, and 15 eyes in 15 patients with OH were examined using an HRT, and the results were analyzed by age, refractive error, and topographic parameters.

RESULTS

Among the HRT parameters, the mean values for rim area, rim volume, cup disk area ratio, and classification showed significant differences among POAG, NTG, and OH eyes. The mean values for cup area, cup volume, mean RNFL thickness, and RNFL cross section area showed significant differences between POAG and NTG eyes, and NTG and OH eyes, however, not between POAG and OH eyes. Cup shape measure showed significant differences between POAG and OH, and NTG and OH eyes, but not between POAG and NTG eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that POAG is distinguishable from NTG and OH based on evaluations of rim area and rim volume. Patients with NTG tend to have larger cupping, smaller rims, and thinner retinal nerve fiber layers as compared to POAG and OH patients. Thus, HRT topographic parameters are useful to differentiate patients with POAG, NTG, and OH.

摘要

背景

海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪(HRT)的检查结果已被用于定量评估视盘的地形学特征。我们使用HRT测量了原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)和高眼压症(OH)患者视盘的地形学参数,以确定HRT地形学参数是否可用于区分这些病症。

方法

使用HRT对17例POAG患者的17只眼、23例NTG患者的23只眼和15例OH患者的15只眼进行了检查,并按年龄、屈光不正和地形学参数对结果进行了分析。

结果

在HRT参数中,边缘面积、边缘体积、杯盘面积比和分类的平均值在POAG、NTG和OH组的眼中存在显著差异。杯面积、杯体积、视网膜神经纤维层平均厚度和视网膜神经纤维层横截面积的平均值在POAG与NTG组的眼之间以及NTG与OH组的眼之间存在显著差异,然而在POAG与OH组的眼之间无显著差异。杯状形态测量在POAG与OH组的眼之间以及NTG与OH组的眼之间存在显著差异,但在POAG与NTG组的眼之间无显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,基于边缘面积和边缘体积的评估,POAG可与NTG和OH区分开来。与POAG和OH患者相比,NTG患者往往有更大的杯状凹陷、更小的边缘以及更薄的视网膜神经纤维层。因此,HRT地形学参数有助于区分POAG、NTG和OH患者。

相似文献

1
A comparison of optic disc topographic parameters in patients with primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension.原发性开角型青光眼、正常眼压性青光眼和高眼压症患者视盘地形图参数的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;241(7):541-545. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0702-0. Epub 2003 Jun 18.
2
The role of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in stereometric differentiation of eye papilla in ocular hypertension, normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.共焦扫描激光眼底镜在高眼压症、正常眼压性青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼视乳头立体测量鉴别中的作用。
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013 Mar;70(3):304-8. doi: 10.2298/vsp120508033g.
3
[A comparative study of optic nerve damage between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma].原发性开角型青光眼与正常眼压性青光眼视神经损害的对比研究
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Feb;41(2):136-40.
4
A comparison of optic nerve head topography in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma in Korean.韩国原发性开角型青光眼与正常眼压性青光眼视神经乳头形态学比较
Korean J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;11(2):79-83. doi: 10.3341/kjo.1997.11.2.79.
5
Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.开角型青光眼和闭角型青光眼患者视神经乳头形态与视野的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Feb;115(2):239-245.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.086.
6
Heidelberg retina tomography and optical coherence tomography in normal, ocular-hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.正常眼、高眼压眼和青光眼眼中的海德堡视网膜断层扫描及光学相干断层扫描
Ophthalmology. 1999 Oct;106(10):2027-32. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90419-0.
7
Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg retina tomograph--new graphical analysis of optic disc topography changes.使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪进行青光眼随访——视盘地形图变化的新图形分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;244(6):654-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-005-0107-3. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
8
Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.基线地形图视盘测量与原发性开角型青光眼的发生相关:高眼压治疗研究的共焦扫描激光眼底镜辅助研究
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;123(9):1188-97. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.9.1188.
9
Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by optical coherence tomography.通过光学相干断层扫描比较原发性开角型青光眼和慢性原发性闭角型青光眼眼中的青光眼性视神经病变。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Sep;25(5):408-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00304.x.
10
[Evaluation of optic disc in open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defect by Heidelberg retinal tomography].[海德堡视网膜断层扫描评估视野缺损型开角型青光眼的视盘]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2001 Nov;37(6):414-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Visualising structural and functional characteristics distinguishing between newly diagnosed high-tension and low-tension glaucoma patients.可视化区分新发高压性和低压性青光眼患者的结构和功能特征。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Jul;43(4):771-787. doi: 10.1111/opo.13129. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
2
Intraocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma, high-tension glaucoma, and normal-tension glaucoma in a Chinese population.中国人原发性闭角型青光眼、高眼压型青光眼和正常眼压型青光眼的视野缺损的眼内不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91173-8.
3
Normal tension glaucoma in Asia: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

本文引用的文献

1
Ability of the heidelberg retina tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss.海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪检测早期青光眼视野损失的能力。
J Glaucoma. 1995 Aug;4(4):242-7.
2
Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender.视盘和视网膜神经纤维层成像:年龄、视盘面积、屈光不正及性别的影响
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002 Jan;19(1):197-207. doi: 10.1364/josaa.19.000197.
3
Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography.
亚洲正常眼压性青光眼:流行病学、发病机制、诊断与治疗
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 13;10(4):250-254. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_30_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
4
Structure-function relationship between Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and perimetry in open-angle glaucoma subtypes.Bruch 膜开口最小边缘宽度与开角型青光眼亚型视野检查的结构-功能关系。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;258(3):595-605. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04557-y. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
5
Latest Developments in Normal-Pressure Glaucoma: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Genetics, Etiology, Causes and Mechanisms to Management.正常眼压性青光眼的最新进展:诊断、流行病学、遗传学、病因学、发病机制和治疗。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Nov-Dec;8(6):457-468. doi: 10.1097/01.APO.0000605096.48529.9c.
6
Early Macular Angiography among Patients with Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, and Normal Subjects.青光眼、高眼压症患者及正常受试者的早期黄斑血管造影
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 15;2019:7419470. doi: 10.1155/2019/7419470. eCollection 2019.
7
Segmental inner macular layer analysis with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for early detection of normal tension glaucoma.应用频域光学相干断层扫描仪对节段性内层视网膜进行分析,以早期检测正常眼压性青光眼。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210215. eCollection 2019.
8
Structural changes of macular inner retinal layers in early normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描观察早期正常眼压性和高眼压性青光眼黄斑区视网膜内层的结构变化。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;256(7):1245-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3944-6. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Normal tension glaucoma: review of current understanding and mechanisms of the pathogenesis.正常眼压性青光眼:当前认识和发病机制的研究进展。
Eye (Lond). 2018 May;32(5):924-930. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0042-2. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
Comparison of retinal microvascular changes in eyes with high-tension glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma: a quantitative optic coherence tomography angiographic study.高眼压性青光眼或正常眼压性青光眼患者眼部视网膜微血管变化的比较:一项定量光学相干断层扫描血管造影研究
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;256(6):1179-1186. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3930-z. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
青光眼患者前瞻性纵向研究中的视盘和视野变化:扫描激光断层扫描与传统视野检查及视盘摄影的比较
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Oct;119(10):1492-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.10.1492.
4
Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma.使用光学成像汇总数据检测青光眼。
Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1812-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00768-0.
5
Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes.海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪检查检测青光眼性视野改变的临床能力。
Ophthalmology. 2001 Sep;108(9):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00676-5.
6
Influence of myopic disc shape on the diagnostic precision of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.近视性视盘形态对海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪诊断准确性的影响。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1999 Sep-Oct;43(5):392-7. doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(99)00096-9.
7
Optic cup deepening spatially correlated with optic nerve damage in focal normal-pressure glaucoma.在局灶性正常眼压性青光眼中,视杯加深与视神经损伤在空间上相关。
J Glaucoma. 1999 Aug;8(4):227-31.
8
A comparison of healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous optic disc topographic parameters.健康、高眼压和青光眼性视盘地形参数的比较。
J Glaucoma. 1997 Dec;6(6):363-70.
9
Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis.利用共焦激光图像分析检测青光眼导致的结构损伤。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Nov;37(12):2393-401.
10
Optic nerve head topography in ocular hypertensive eyes using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.使用共焦扫描激光眼科显微镜观察高眼压眼的视神经乳头形态
Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;122(4):520-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72112-9.