Schellman John A
Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97405, USA.
Biophys J. 2003 Jul;85(1):108-25. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74459-2.
Changes in excluded volume and contact interaction with the surface of a protein have been suggested as mechanisms for the changes in stability induced by cosolvents. The aim of the present paper is to present an analysis that combines both effects in a quantitative manner. The result is that both processes are present in both stabilizing and destabilizing interactions and neither can be ignored. Excluded volume was estimated using accessible surface area calculations of the kind introduced by Lee and Richards. The change in excluded volume on unfolding, deltaX, is quite large. For example, deltaX for ribonuclease is 6.7 L in urea and approximately 16 L in sucrose. The latter number is greater than the molar volume of the protein. Direct interaction with the protein is represented as the solvent exchange mechanism, which differs from ordinary association theory because of the weakness of the interaction and the high concentrations of cosolvents. The balance between the two effects and their contribution to overall stability are most simply presented as bar diagrams as in Fig. 3. Our finding for five proteins is that excluded volume contributes to the stabilization of the native structure and that contact interaction contributes to destabilization. This is true for five proteins and four cosolvents including both denaturants and osmolytes. Whether a substance stabilizes a protein or destabilizes it depends on the relative size of these two contributions. The constant for the cosolvent contact with the protein is remarkably uniform for four of the proteins, indicating a similarity of groups exposed during unfolding. One protein, staphylococcus nuclease, is anomalous in almost all respects. In general, the strength of the interaction with guanidinium is about twice that of urea, which is about twice that of trimethylamine-N-oxide and sucrose. Arguments are presented for the use of volume fractions in equilibrium equations and the ignoring of activity coefficients of the cosolvent. It is shown in the Appendix that both the excluded volume and the direct interaction can be extracted in a unified way from the McMillan-Mayer formula for the second virial coefficient.
排除体积的变化以及与蛋白质表面的接触相互作用,被认为是共溶剂诱导稳定性变化的机制。本文的目的是以定量方式结合这两种效应进行分析。结果表明,在稳定和去稳定相互作用中都存在这两个过程,且都不能被忽视。排除体积是使用Lee和Richards提出的那种可及表面积计算方法来估算的。去折叠时排除体积的变化量ΔX相当大。例如,核糖核酸酶在尿素中的ΔX为6.7L,在蔗糖中约为16L。后一个数值大于蛋白质的摩尔体积。与蛋白质的直接相互作用表现为溶剂交换机制,由于相互作用较弱且共溶剂浓度较高,它与普通缔合理论不同。这两种效应之间的平衡及其对整体稳定性的贡献,最简单的呈现方式是如图3所示的柱状图。我们对五种蛋白质的研究发现,排除体积有助于天然结构的稳定,而接触相互作用则导致去稳定。对于五种蛋白质和四种共溶剂(包括变性剂和渗透压剂)都是如此。一种物质是使蛋白质稳定还是去稳定,取决于这两种贡献的相对大小。四种蛋白质与共溶剂接触的常数非常一致,表明去折叠过程中暴露的基团具有相似性。有一种蛋白质,即葡萄球菌核酸酶,在几乎所有方面都异常。一般来说,与胍盐的相互作用强度约为尿素的两倍,尿素约为三甲胺 - N - 氧化物和蔗糖的两倍。文中给出了在平衡方程中使用体积分数并忽略共溶剂活度系数的理由。附录表明,排除体积和直接相互作用都可以从第二维里系数的麦克米伦 - 迈耶公式中以统一的方式提取出来。