• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FLACC行为疼痛评估量表:与儿童自我报告的比较。

FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child's self-report.

作者信息

Willis Martha H W, Merkel Sandra I, Voepel-Lewis Terri, Malviya Shobha

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;29(3):195-8.

PMID:12836995
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to further test the validity of the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale for use with children. Thirty children aged 3-7 years (5.01 +/- 1.44) who had undergone a variety of surgical procedures were observed and assessed for pain intensity at 20 + 2 hours after surgery. FLACC scores were assigned by one of the nurse investigators, and a self-report of pain using the FACES scale was obtained from the child. There were significant and positive correlations between the FLACC and FACES scores for the entire sample and for the scores of children 5-7 years of age, but not for children < age 5. These findings provide additional support for the construct validity of the FLACC Pain Assessment Tool.

摘要

本研究的目的是进一步检验面部、腿部、活动、哭闹及可安慰性(FLACC)行为疼痛评估量表在儿童中的有效性。对30名年龄在3至7岁(平均5.01±1.44岁)且接受了各种外科手术的儿童,在术后20±2小时进行了疼痛强度的观察和评估。FLACC评分由一名护士研究者给出,同时从儿童处获得使用面部表情量表的疼痛自评结果。在整个样本以及5至7岁儿童的得分中,FLACC与面部表情量表得分之间存在显著正相关,但在5岁以下儿童中则不存在。这些发现为FLACC疼痛评估工具的结构效度提供了更多支持。

相似文献

1
FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child's self-report.FLACC行为疼痛评估量表:与儿童自我报告的比较。
Pediatr Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;29(3):195-8.
2
Validity of parent ratings as proxy measures of pain in children with cognitive impairment.家长评分作为认知障碍儿童疼痛替代指标的有效性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2005 Dec;6(4):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2005.08.004.
3
The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中的COMFORT行为量表和改良的FLACC量表。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00323.x.
4
Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安抚性行为工具评估危重症患者急性疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624.
5
Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery.COMFORT行为量表和FLACC量表在中国儿童心脏手术后疼痛评估中的有效性验证。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Mar;13(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.07.002. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale.FLACC:非语言患者疼痛量表的临床验证。
Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):140-6.
7
The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children.使用面部、腿部、活动、哭声及安慰度量表评估幼儿的操作疼痛和痛苦。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1281-96. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182767d66.
8
The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.用于5至16岁儿童程序性疼痛评估的FLACC行为量表。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Aug;18(8):767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02655.x.
9
Cross-validation of a self-report scale for postoperative pain in school-aged children.学龄儿童术后疼痛自我报告量表的交叉验证
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Mar;88(3):412-8.
10
The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安抚性观察工具作为评估认知障碍儿童疼痛程度的可靠性和有效性。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1224-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of strong analgesics for prehospital pain management in children in the region of Southern Denmark: a register-based study.丹麦南部地区儿童院前疼痛管理中强效镇痛药的使用:一项基于登记册的研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 5;33(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01339-w.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Different Pain-alleviating Methods on Child's Dental Anxiety and Pain Perception during Local Anesthesia Administration: A Clinical Study.不同镇痛方法对儿童局部麻醉给药期间牙科焦虑和疼痛感知的比较评估:一项临床研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1265-1271. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2956. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
3
Comparison of different techniques used for inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia regarding the pain caused in cooperative children.
关于在合作儿童中引起的疼痛,比较用于下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉的不同技术。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Feb;26(1):139-147. doi: 10.1007/s40368-024-00972-w. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
4
Alisklamp versus Conventional Dorsal Slit Circumcision: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial.阿利斯克兰普环切术与传统背侧切开包皮环切术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 5;13(15):4568. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154568.
5
Comparative Evaluation of New Needleless Local Anesthetic System (INJEX) and Conventional Syringe Needle Technique during Pulpotomy Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.牙髓切断术治疗中新型无针局部麻醉系统(INJEX)与传统注射器针头技术的比较评估:一项随机临床试验
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;11(5):514. doi: 10.3390/children11050514.
6
Pain assessment, cognitive and cortical changes with full mouth rehabilitation in a group of children.全口修复治疗对一组儿童的疼痛评估、认知和皮质变化。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 23;24(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04356-w.
7
Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of a New Experimental Mucoadhesive Patch for Topical Anesthesia of Oral Mucosa in Pediatric Dentistry.一种新型实验性口腔黏膜黏附贴片用于儿童牙科口腔黏膜局部麻醉的临床疗效和耐受性
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 8;13(6):1558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061558.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-hole laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children by senior pediatric surgeons: a multicenter study from China.资深小儿外科医生进行的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗儿童急性阑尾炎的比较:一项来自中国的多中心研究
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 10;11:1224113. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1224113. eCollection 2023.
9
Systemic Analgesia versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Infusion During Paediatric Nephrectomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.小儿肾切除术期间全身镇痛与竖脊肌平面连续阻滞(ESPB)输注的比较:一项随机对照试验
Local Reg Anesth. 2023 Jun 5;16:59-69. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S401980. eCollection 2023.
10
A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale for Pediatric Pain Assessment.用于小儿疼痛评估的面部、腿部、活动、哭闹及可安慰性量表测量属性的系统评价
J Pain Res. 2023 Apr 8;16:1185-1196. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S397064. eCollection 2023.